I "see" a huge problem with the scientific concept of Brain. But I will state, from the beginning, that I am approaching this topic from a Perspective that admits of the Experience of overwhelming Belief; that is to say, the Momentum of the majority's Belief. The "hive mind" would also have to have a phenomenology that provides for an Experience of it as well, but the greater point here is that, as I see it, Brain is a manifestation of Mind, but more specifically, a manifestation of the Momentum of Belief. The "idea" that something nonphysical can be the driving force which moves Matter, is one thing. That a nonphysical entity can appear to the senses as a quite physical entity, is a whole other monster. But, is what I seek to explain/argue. This topic tho, touches and hangs on several other phenomenology's. For instance, the eye.... What do we actually see? And this leads into a topic of Space and of Nothingness and of course our modern mindset based on atoms and smaller nanoparticles. But the Eye, and Phenomenology, are intrinsically intertwined, providing for a Tapestry of self-deceit, and the deceit of the masses as a whole, who base their definitions and meanings on things that merely appear to the senses, without understanding how those manifestations arise. Presupposing the world of Experiences.

So, the cadaver on the slab of metal, when the skull is opened, shows a brain, blood, flesh, and every other aspect of the room. But all is an Experience. The point here, is that the brain is said to be the cause of all Experience. So the brain decides how it will be Experienced....?? How at all is this justified? Yes, I get the momentum of the many, but if the brain is lying, which we all know by way of Perspective that this is probable, then the circular nature of our science is determined to keep us from having full Dominion over our Experience/s in the world.

Moreover, though the brain may be the deciding factor in what we Experience, before the world external meets the brain, it must first meet the eye. Is this the reason for all the eye references throughout mythology? You "see"? Lol, this entire subject seems impossible to crack, yet as I understand it, is the subject of many, many writings and artworks of a small group of people hardly recognized, if at all, throughout history. These topics, and many others under it, are what I understand the writers of the alchemy books to have been so willing to die for. Not that any could hear them anyway, but to ensure they do not affect the ruling class, many were publicly burned. That momentum has carried down through the ages. To challenge the authority of the scientific is to challenge the entire structure of society, and therefore I may appear as the heretic of the day, and as such, I too expect the trial by fire.

But as the alchemists of old, I have learned to make fire afraid of Fire :)

The ruling class is responsible for the continuation and solidification of the greatest lie ever told. The house divided. A science based on the experience of the many, is easily misleading, and circular. Don't shoot the messenger.