• Mww
    4.9k
    Didn't mean to leave you hanging.Garrett Travers

    You didn’t, so no worries.

    I was commenting....editorializing.....on page 7 here, as a spectator.

    That page was pretty unimpressive, considering the norm.
  • Deleted User
    -1
    That page was pretty unimpressive, considering the norm.Mww

    Yeah, I don't even know how to address stuff like that anymore. It's 2022 on a philosophy forum, a month after they send the most sophistacted telescope into space on a plotted trajectory a million miles from the Earth's surface, and I'm still hearing arguments that belong in a dungeons and dragons role play. I don't even know what to say to such things.
  • Mww
    4.9k


    Ehhhh....dunno what to tell ya, man. It’s your thread, so I guess you’re kinda stuck with what you get.
  • Deleted User
    -1


    A most accurate observation, friend.
  • Janus
    16.3k
    I'm here to discuss this with you, not to be directed to read articles of a kind I've already looked at, and have no argument with, as far as they go.

    So please answer the question: do thoughts as neural processes temporally precede thoughts as consciously entertained? You do agree that we are not aware of neural processes in the brain as neural processes in the brain I presume?

    If you can't, or won't answer that, then we have nothing further to discuss.
156789Next
bold
italic
underline
strike
code
quote
ulist
image
url
mention
reveal
youtube
tweet
Add a Comment

Welcome to The Philosophy Forum!

Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.