Sorry, but they do. — Bartricks
Address the OP. — Bartricks
This is the only line worth anything in the OP, and it is worth nothing. — Streetlight
"Reasons" =/= "directives" as you point out below with "directives OF reason", so your premise is false and invalidates your "argument".First, reasons to believe things are directives to believe things. — Bartricks
Oops. :snicker:[ ... ] because all of the directives of reason are her directives.
Do you understand what a self-undermining case is? — Bartricks
"Reasons" =/= "directives" as you point out below with "directives OF reason", so your premise is false and invalidates your "argument".
[ ... ] because all of the directives of reason are her directives.
Oops. :snicker: — 180 Proof
It really doesn't matter because God in the OP has nothing to do with it other than a rabbit which you pull put of a hat as a literal deus ex machina. I don't need to follow your argument because there isn't one. — Streetlight
Once more, address the OP. — Bartricks
So the case for evolution by natural selection presupposes that God exists. — Bartricks
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.