Does it really need to be said that you're massively oversimplify the enculturation of multiculturalism in the political north by tying it to the work of a philosopher obscure even among graduates of philosophy? — fdrake

I agree that your last comment didn’t really need to be said.

:fire:

Let's leave it at that then. :up:

While it seems possible that Angelo Cannata is putting words in Heidegger's mouth, I quite like the thrust of the OP.

Objectivity, the concept exists of course, but is it ever achieved? If never, it's utterly useless and serves only to impede progress, by making us chase after what is at the end of the day a mere mirage. Let's be objective and off we go on a wild goose chase!

I think you essentially understand Heidegger. To reject objectivity and subjectivity is to side with subjectivity