• Alkis Piskas
    2.1k
    I didn't say i knew anything about the topic.Gregory
    No, you didn't have to. It showed by itself. And yet, you have launched a discussion about it. So, my question was, how comes you didn't at least try to learn something about it. That's all.
  • Gregory
    5k


    My point was to learn from the discussion and your aggression is unwanted. Why dont you provide your philosophy here on AI right now? Not factodes, but philosophical thought. I'll comment
  • Alkis Piskas
    2.1k

    You make no sense, man.
  • MoK
    1.9k

    There is no need for consciousness when it comes to reasoning. We can simulate the brain if we know how it works when it comes to reasoning. There are three questions that we need to answer before we can design an AI that can reason. These questions are:
    1) How the new information is classified in the brain?
    2) How the related information are linked in the brain?
    3) How do we find new information from the linked information?
  • Patterner
    1.9k
    Just rambling thoughts. Probably already posted here. I was just thinking that intelligence is intelligence. It can't be artificial. That sounds like pretending to be awake.

    Artificially Produced Intelligence or Artificially Created Intelligence would be more accurate? Of course, Human Produced Intelligence would be better.
123Next
bold
italic
underline
strike
code
quote
ulist
image
url
mention
reveal
youtube
tweet
Add a Comment

Welcome to The Philosophy Forum!

Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.