-
Artaxata
1I need to make an essay for school about the following!
1. Explain why you do or do not think the division in three worlds is useful.
2. Try to generalize the definition of the three worlds in such a way that it is no longer anthropocentric.
3. Can you give some personal remarks or observations?
Purpose: To add a modern philosophical perspective that might be productive.
Based on Popper, K. (1978). Three worlds. Tanner lecture
Welcome to The Philosophy Forum!
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.
Categories
- Guest category
- The Lounge
- General Philosophy
- Metaphysics & Epistemology
- Philosophy of Mind
- Ethics
- Political Philosophy
- Philosophy of Art
- Logic & Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Religion
- Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Language
- Interesting Stuff
- Politics and Current Affairs
- Humanities and Social Sciences
- Science and Technology
- Non-English Discussion
- German Discussion
- Spanish Discussion
- Learning Centre
- Resources
- Books and Papers
- Reading groups
- Questions
- Guest Speakers
- David Pearce
- Massimo Pigliucci
- Debates
- Debate Proposals
- Debate Discussion
- Feedback
- Article submissions
- About TPF
- Help
More Discussions
- Religious Perspectives and Sexuality: What are the Controversial Areas For Philosophical Debate?
- A read-thru: Wittgenstein's Blue Book (Sec 4C Philosophical “Attitude”)
- On Wittgenstein's Quietism and the possibility of philosophical certainty
- Is current development of the society caused by the lack of philosophical thinking?
- Other sites we like
- Social media
- Terms of Service
- Sign In
- Created with PlushForums
- © 2024 The Philosophy Forum