Can anyone help with this argument reconstruction?
  • KantDane21
    47
    The following argument is in Paul Guyer's text "Kant" (Routledge). I am trying to reconstruct it, yet am not sure the of the form of the argument.

    If whenever one experiences appearances, one does not gain knowledge of the noumenon, and yet (in) one’s awareness of one’s own individual will does gain knowledge of the noumenon, then one’s awareness of one’s own individual will could not be the experiencing of appearances.

    A- one experiences appearances B- one gains knowledge of the noumenon C- awareness of one’s own individual will

    Thus:

    If A then not B If C then B C then not A

    Yet the above is not a valid argument form (as far as I can determine).
    KantDane21 Options
  • bongo fury
    1.6k
    If A then not B
    If C then B
    [If] C then not A     — KantDane21

    A, B, C ---> P, M, S

    dhszi21wichcy8vk.png
    bongo fury Options
  • KantDane21
    47
    A, B, C ---> P, M, S — bongo fury

    that's great! did you use an app??
    KantDane21 Options
  • bongo fury
    1.6k
    ↪KantDane21
    No, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syllogism?wprov=sfla1 has a list
    bongo fury Options
  • KantDane21
    47
    something like:
    No experience of appearance results in knowledge of noumenon
    All awareness of will is knowledge of noumenon
    thus,
    No awareness of will is experience of appearance.
    KantDane21 Options
  • bongo fury
    1.6k
    Yes, your parsing seemed right.
    bongo fury Options
  • alan1000
    200
    bongo fury, please don't fall into the habit of relying on Wikipedia to support your arguments! Its contributors are, by and large, utterly unfamiliar with the philosophy of mathematics. Its article listing the arguments to prove that 0 is an even number is an intellectual fog from beginning to end.
    alan1000 Options
bold
italic
underline
strike
code
quote
ulist
image
url
mention
reveal
youtube
tweet
Add a Comment

Welcome to The Philosophy Forum!

Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.

Sign In Create Account

Categories