• 180 Proof
    15.3k
    Alrighty. :up:
    Well according to my parsimonious 'two types', I cop to philosophical naturalism (i.e. prioritizing ontological immanence over ontological non-immanence) in my praxes.
  • Janus
    16.3k
    :lol: Appropriate clip!

    :up: If I have a tendency any way it would be that way...I certainly don't believe in or prepare for an after life.
  • Paine
    2.5k
    This is an interesting approach since I have problems with classification.

    I agree with Deleuze when he treats some concepts as created things. When one uses them as a point of departure, the thought is some of them and some of the one using it. That is a different activity from each of us expressing ourselves as well as we can with the words we can share as given starting points.

    That is why I put effort into wrestling with 'primary' text. I want to have what is said to be mine, but I recognize when the feeling is not mutual.
12Next
bold
italic
underline
strike
code
quote
ulist
image
url
mention
reveal
youtube
tweet
Add a Comment