I have two questions:
1. Is nothing part of everything?
2. Nothing is something?
Whereas we have not merely shown that things that are not, are, but we have brought to light the real character of 'not being'. We have shown that the nature of the different has existence and is parceled out over the whole field of existent things with reference to one another, and of every part of it that is set in contrast to that which is; we have dared to say that precisely that is really that 'which is not'
I have two questions:
1. Is nothing part of everything?
2. Nothing is something? — wax1232
1. Is nothing part of everything? — wax1232
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.