• boundless
    306


    Ok, I now read your link. I think I am understanding better also your position.

    The assumption here is that there is a sort of law/principle that treats the transition between 'non-life' and 'life', abiogenesis, as a sort of phase transition - i.e. a 'regularity' that, in principle, can allow us to build a predective model that predicts under which conditions life can arise. I think that it is reasonable. But of course, the details are not clear and only a theoretical approach might not be able to construct such a model.

    Do you believe that such a model could be expressed as a mathematical theory, like in theoretical physics?

    Also: are there some books that you would suggest to explore this topic?

    BTW, thanks for the discussion, it has been very productive and insightful!
  • apokrisis
    7.3k
    Also: are there some books that you would suggest to explore this topic?boundless

    Nick Lane’s The Vital Question is excellent. And Peter Hoffman’s Life’s Ratchet.

    Lane has lots of YouTube talks on his book.

    Eric Smith is great - https://youtu.be/0cwvj0XBKlE?si=X8ksxZNJjOLdjlj5

    Loren Williams talks on the evolution of the ribosome - https://youtu.be/AF0VmMvE1yI?si=msA7LgpLvKx6AfYn

    The area has got interesting in just the past decade as a flood of new techniques are cracking open the questions.
123456Next
bold
italic
underline
strike
code
quote
ulist
image
url
mention
reveal
youtube
tweet
Add a Comment

Welcome to The Philosophy Forum!

Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.