Actually, I have--in my last post, and in the post before where you ignored the part below. But since you've offered no actual points, we're definitely done.
Anyone should know that personal anecdotal experience is not sufficient evidence to speak for a group. And no, it does not--except the fundamentalists--hide a hidden shame or interpret scripture to find it, and most Christians don't go looking for it. — John Harris
↪Noble Dust
What I mean is that you're making assertions instead of crafting an argument. — Noble Dust
I continue to generalize because you continued to generalized in the bold quote below. The only difference is my generalizations are accurate. Are your generalizations based on pew research data or something, or are they based on your personal experience? Because personal experience certainly wouldn't suffice. — John Harris
You can disagree, but you'd be wrong,
— John Harris
Yes, you can disagree, but you'd be wrong, and no childish--are you over 18?--emolji changes that. — John Harris
No, that's been you, — John Harris
↪Noble Dust
This is theologically true, but not really the case in the general zeitgeist of the faith, which is what I was commenting on. I already made the distinction later on in that post.
↪Noble Dust
What I mean is that you're making assertions instead of crafting an argument.
↪Noble Dust
As you've offered no actual points for me to address here.
↪Noble Dust
This is theologically true, but not really the case in the general zeitgeist of the faith, which is what I was commenting on.
↪Noble Dust
You continue to generalize
Anyone should know that personal anecdotal experience is not sufficient evidence to speak for a group. And no, it does not--except the fundamentalists--hide a hidden shame or interpret scripture to find it, and most Christians don't go looking for it.
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.