Look what happened to Socrates!!!

Can it be said the unconscious unformed
soul of mankind is unready and unwilling to
be mediated and transformed by linguistic accounts relating to perception and desire?

The notion that 'philosophical counselling'
empowers the 'patient' to own recognisable
symptoms and conquer the powers of the soul,
or form healthy relationships to
alleviate obsessive or vice like attachments is
a considerable leap over forms that are culturally operating through qualification and supervision.

Where then does such a term that professes
competencies and efficacies have its
justifications?

And if it can resolve to function and performance.
Where does it stand in context next to, spiritual guidance, cognitive growth, mental health and
anxiety alleviation, overcoming unhealthy attachment and negative attitudes, behaviour and positive progress in the workplace.

Are these amongst others, not already defined
outcomes in other professional services?

If there's something to profit from such a
thing as 'philosophical counselling' loosely
grouped in the class of talking to therapies,
then what would you provide and to how would you determine the type of client, and their
readiness to engage with something that runs
close to psychological therapy but relates to
education and perspective shaping through linguistic gymnastics?

Is the idea of 'philosophical counselling', a
wasteful project or something that acts
as a basis of potential?

Would you be content to rent an office and
get a signwriter to place your name next to
the title, 'philosophical counsellor'?