• BC
    13.6k
    This weekend there were two really, really negative editorials and one positive one about Hugh Hefner. The two negative ones were by the regular NYT Ross Dothan; the other was by Susan Brownmiller.

    Hef was the grinning pimp of the sexual revolution, with quaaludes for the ladies and Viagra for himself — a father of smut addictions and eating disorders, abortions and divorce and syphilis, a pretentious huckster who published Updike stories no one read while doing flesh procurement for celebrities, a revolutionary whose revolution chiefly benefited men much like himself.
    RD

    Brownmiller quotes Barbara Ehrenreich: “The magazine’s real message was not eroticism but escape from the bondage of breadwinning. Sex — or Hefner’s Pepsi-clean version of it — was there to legitimize what was truly subversive about Playboy. In every issue, in every month, there was a Playmate to prove that a playboy didn’t have to be a husband to be a man.” The reason Mr. Hefner supported abortion was not from any feminist feeling; it was purely strategic.

    Amber Batura, in another article about how Hefner "invented the modern man", says
    The masculine ideal of the era was narrowly defined: aloof, outdoorsy, a breadwinner, “manly.” Showing too much of an interest in culture, fine food or travel was anathema. Mr. Hefner felt trapped by conformity and designed a magazine that promoted a very different idea of what made an individual a “man” through its features and advice on clothing, food, alcohol selections, art, music and literature. Though it quickly became a cliché, many male readers really did “read it for the articles,” telling surveys that they enjoyed features on the ideal bachelor pad even more than the centerfold.

    I think Amber Batura is right. Playboy magazine was one of several critical influences on culture in the 1950s-1970s. For millions of people, it was a positive influence. Not for everybody, though. Brownmiller told Hefner "You are my enemy" on the Dick Cavett show in 1970. Dothan even blames Hefner for syphilis--quite an achievement.

    Playboy: Good or Bad?
  • Baden
    16.4k
    If he hadn't cornered the market in middle-class masturbation, I'm sure someone else would have. I doubt he made all that much difference one way of the other.
  • BC
    13.6k
    Classism.

    Surely you are not saying that working class men didn't masturbate to Playboy centerfolds?
  • Wayfarer
    22.8k
    Agree with Douthat.
  • Baden
    16.4k


    Hustler was the working man's porn rag I thought?
  • Jamal
    9.8k
    He probably deserves all that, yes, but on the other hand...

    ...Hefner, above all, was committed to the liberties of all; not just the lifestyle of would-be playboys, but also those fighting for civil rights, those who were still falling foul of repressive laws, those who desired liberty but found it being shamefully restricted. So at his Playboy clubs during the 1960s, you could hear black comedians perform when most other comedy clubs were still segregated. (Indeed, he even gave $25,000 to one of those comedians, Dick Gregory, to use as a reward for information regarding the murder of three young civil-rights activists in Mississippi, as a result of which convictions were successfully brought against several KKK members.) You could find Hefner in the 1970s, his hands deep in his pockets, funding Jesse Jackson’s civil-rights group, the Rainbow PUSH coalition; and you could find him supporting the comedian Lenny Bruce when many others had abandoned him because of his obscenity convictions. In the words of Hefner’s daughter, Christie, he couldn’t bear to see anyone ‘persecuted or prosecuted for his words and his ideas’.

    In the 1980s, he enshrined his commitment to freedom of expression by founding the Hugh Hefner First Amendment Awards. The diversity of the recipients testifies to Hefner’s awareness that fundamental freedoms have to be universal. The list includes women and men, right-wingers and left wingers, Muslims and atheists, and even a pair of magicians in Penn and Teller. It shows that Hefner was willing to support anyone who made the case for greater freedom of thought and speech, from campaigners against government spying in the name of counterterrorism to those who sought to end blacklisting in the television industry.
    — Tim Black
    http://www.spiked-online.com/newsite/article/lets-hear-it-for-the-hef/#.WdIAWk2CzCI
  • Wayfarer
    22.8k
    high minded sentiments but a lot depends on what constitutes 'liberty'. There's an outlink in the Douthat editorial to a piece by an erstwhile Playmate, and it reveals a lot about the tawdriness behind the bling.
  • t0m
    319

    Great reading, at least for those sinners like myself who still enjoy the "high minded sentiments" of liberty.
  • Baden
    16.4k
    People are complicated.
  • Cuthbert
    1.1k
    Before the 1960's it did not occur to men to dream about having sex with beautiful, compliant women. Hefner created and popularised this new area of interest and his reputation as an innovator cannot be under-estimated.
  • BC
    13.6k
    My exposure to Playboy Magazine is minimal, so I can't actually judge it. (Gay guys generally weren't / aren't eager Playboy readers.) I didn't aspire to a gay playboy lifestyle either (couldn't begin to afford it).

    I was joking about the classist nature of your comment. All publishing caters to class--upper, middle, lower, prole--and so does the porn industry (in which I wouldn't include Playboy). Hefner's
    business was up-market nightclub entertainment--at least that's my impression. Playboy was sold in the front of newsstands, not under the counter, in back, or in the brown paper bag format.

    The retail venues where people used to buy books and magazines, from the New Yorker to hardcore porn, have gone the way of much other retail, but there were several grades of refinement available. Playboy, Hustler, Penthouse, and Screw, etc.

    I'm not quite sure who Al Goldstein aimed Screw at, but its aesthetic was decidedly downmarket. If there is such a thing as irreverent porn, Screw was it. Everything that Playboy wasn't.

    tumblr_o0r60j2pCM1qag2f8o4_540.jpg
  • Baden
    16.4k


    Looks like most of my high school reading material :) . Anyway, my general thought on this is that Hefner's death is a matter for him and his family. The rest is about selling newspapers, and editorials cherry picking from his life to further their own agenda and settle their own scores either personal or political. Right now, there's not much more to it than voyeurism, ironically, considering the subject. It would probably take years more of research to come up with anything very interesting or enlightening about his personality that is actually verifiably true. And by that time there will probably be few people who care enough to listen.
  • Ciceronianus
    3k
    Hefner and Playboy may have been remarkable in the 1950s, but were antiquated by the late 1960s. Which is not to say that pictures of nude or nearly nude beautiful young women failed to titillate then or ever will, but the Playboy man as represented and glorified by Hefner became progressively silly, a kind of 50s idealization of a sophisticate and man-about-town wearing bathrobes and pajamas. History passed them by, and rightly so. They don't deserve the lashing they're getting (oooh, a whip!), but Americans have always been upset by and obsessed with sex and especially by the fact that it is enjoyable. They weren't evil, not really, compared with the evil we regularly do, but very juvenile.
  • Jake Tarragon
    341
    I applaud his active and multi faceted liberalism. The mags I never got though , and his lifestyle even less, because while I think porn has a well defined and acceptable role to play it is just for sexual gratification. I thought his lifestyle was a bit silly really - almost as if he was guilty about sex per se so had to weave in a ridiculous narrative about his retinue.
  • Hanover
    13k
    The days of sneaking away someone's dad's Playboy seem like such innocent times compared to today's internet. Whatever damage he did by publishing his R rated pictures is unrecognizable by the damage done by the porn now openly available.
  • Umbra
    15
    I mostly appreciate his love for/fiscal contributions to promoting jazz music (Miles Davis was the first long-form interview published by the mag in 1962).
  • Wayfarer
    22.8k
    The days of sneaking away someone's dad's Playboy seem like such innocent times compared to today's internet.Hanover

    It was a 'gateway drug'.
  • Cuthbert
    1.1k
    His commitment to civil rights carried through into his business and personal life. He stood up for the right of every human being - young or young, woman or woman, blonde or redhead - to dress up as a rabbit and serve drinks to leering perverts.
bold
italic
underline
strike
code
quote
ulist
image
url
mention
reveal
youtube
tweet
Add a Comment

Welcome to The Philosophy Forum!

Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.