• Agustino
    11.2k
    Sure, or one join with other people and in combination gain and exercise power, collectively.Bitter Crank
    Yes, I thought about that, unfortunately, that way seems blocked with many risks and obstacles. Such a collective project always entails the risk of a man (or woman) - like Stalin - being shrewd enough to take control of it and derail the ideals behind it, after it has already been set in motion and gained traction. That's exactly why I think that the other route is to be favoured.

    It's the "how" of money or resources that is important.Bitter Crank
    What do you mean by the "how"? How money is used? How it is gained? Both? If both I suppose I'd agree with that.
12Next
bold
italic
underline
strike
code
quote
ulist
image
url
mention
reveal
youtube
tweet
Add a Comment

Welcome to The Philosophy Forum!

Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.