3. In perhaps a short while, you may come to recognize that instead of belief, one may instead employ scientific thinking. — ProgrammingGodJordan
2. My response: That's ironic, for you have constantly rehashed or implied that belief is crucial. — ProgrammingGodJordan
3. Why do you garner that belief is crucial? — ProgrammingGodJordan
Instead, we may employ scientific thinking, that largely prioritizes evidence, — ProgrammingGodJordan
1. I don't detect any novel information from those threads.
I've been discussing "non-beliefism" online since 2016, so I've seen many similar responses. — ProgrammingGodJordan
I've been discussing "non-beliefism" online since 2016, so I've seen many similar responses. — ProgrammingGodJordan
Belief (not just religious belief) ought to be abolished! — ProgrammingGodJordan
As Neil deGrasse Tyson says, science is true whether or not one believes in it! — ProgrammingGodJordan
Belief (by definition and research) is a model, that permits both science, and non-science.
However, crucially, belief typically facilitates that people especially ignore evidence.
A model that generally permits the large ignorance of evidence contrasts science.
Instead, we may employ scientific thinking, that largely prioritizes evidence, rather than a model (i.e. belief) that facilitates largely, the ignorance of evidence. — ProgrammingGodJordan
2. Again, why do you garner that belief is unavoidable? — ProgrammingGodJordan
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.