what does that imply to you? — flannel jesus
What bearing does any of this have on the question of whether Trump and his co-defendants are guilty of election interference? What is it about this "improper" romantic relationship that should stand as grounds to disqualify her?
It seems to me that it is nothing more than an attempt to distract and shift focus. It may play well with some voters, but it has no legal merit with regard to the charges against Trump, Roman, and the others. — Fooloso4
The potential jury pool is watching this mess. It may be enough for Willis to be removed from this case. — RogueAI
I think you can convict Trump by just playing the call to Raffensperger, but I won't be on the jury.
An election crime is generally a federal crime if:
It's a hard choice - between a narcissist con man and a supporter and facilitator of genocide and ethnic cleansing. — unenlightened
Look, the other guy does it too." seems like a weak defence in law, and an even weaker justification in political discussion. — unenlightened
It's a hard choice - between a narcissist con man and a supporter and facilitator of genocide and ethnic cleansing. I think I prefer the nut-job myself, but it's your call, America. — unenlightened
Donald Trump has said he would "encourage" Russia to attack any Nato member that fails to pay its bills as part of the Western military alliance.
At a rally on Saturday, he said he had once told a leader he would not protect a nation behind on its payments, and would "encourage" the aggressors to "do whatever the hell they want".
Does Trump think it's just a protection racket? — Benkei
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.