• Tomek
    1
    Hello!
    I will very appreciate if someone can tell me a core difference between the Frege's concept of sense and reference (Sinn und Bedeutung) and Mill's concept of connotation and dennotation.
  • Srap Tasmaner
    4.9k

    Sorry, I don't know Mill, but the way "connotation" is used in ordinary language, it would be the sort of thing Frege calls "coloring", among other things. Aspects of meaning that don't affect reference, the truth value of assertions a word is used in, and so on. Connotations are at least usually public, rather than just private associations, and Frege definitely wants sense to be public, but may not affect how reference is determined. (Maybe there's a different connotation for "the President" and "the Prez", but not the kind of difference that would change the truth value of sentences I used those words in.)

    The analogy he gives is this: when you look through a telescope, there's the object you're looking at (reference), the image of the object on the mirror, viewable by whoever uses the telescope (sense), and then there's the entirely private image formed on your retina.
  • Wayfarer
    22.5k
    Fishing for assignment answers. It's a very specialised topic, you'd be better off doing your own research! And good luck with it.
bold
italic
underline
strike
code
quote
ulist
image
url
mention
reveal
youtube
tweet
Add a Comment

Welcome to The Philosophy Forum!

Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.