• Gabriel Azevedo
    1
    Can someone explain to me what Leibniz means in his philosophical essay on numerical characteristics for his universal language when he says:

    "We must also consider the fact that all negative terms have the property that
    when positive terms are related as genus and species, their negations, on the
    other hand, are inversely related, as species and genus."

    And to help you explain, Leibniz gives an example of what he is trying to say:

    "For example, "body"
    is genus, and "animal" is species, for "body" is broader than "animal" since
    "body" contains animals, plants, and other things. But, on the other hand,
    "nonanimal" is broader than "nonbody." For all nonbodies are also nonanimals,
    but not conversely, for there are nonanimals which, however, are not
    nonbodies, for example, plants. Thus, just as there are more bodies than
    animals, so, on the other hand, there are more nonanimals than nonbodies."
  • fdrake
    6.7k
    Cakes (genus) food (species)

    A non-food must not be a cake, since if a non-food was cake it would indeed be food. This is because cakes are foods. Another way of saying that cakes are foods is that cakes are a genus of the species foods.

    A non-cake could still be food, for example a sandwich. This is because some non-cakes are still foods.

    So there are more things which are 'non-cakes' than there are things which are 'non-foods'.
bold
italic
underline
strike
code
quote
ulist
image
url
mention
reveal
youtube
tweet
Add a Comment

Welcome to The Philosophy Forum!

Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.