-
khaled
3.5kSorry, relativism won't do. Unless you're prepared to demonstrate that nothing is better - or worse - than anything else — tim wood
Who defines "better" and "worse"
My question:
What's your point?
— tim wood
was asking what your point was. — tim wood
I didn't have one. I'm not trying to discuss relativism in this thread unless you insist
Welcome to The Philosophy Forum!
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.
Categories
- Guest category
- Phil. Writing Challenge - June 2025
- The Lounge
- General Philosophy
- Metaphysics & Epistemology
- Philosophy of Mind
- Ethics
- Political Philosophy
- Philosophy of Art
- Logic & Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Religion
- Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Language
- Interesting Stuff
- Politics and Current Affairs
- Humanities and Social Sciences
- Science and Technology
- Non-English Discussion
- German Discussion
- Spanish Discussion
- Learning Centre
- Resources
- Books and Papers
- Reading groups
- Questions
- Guest Speakers
- David Pearce
- Massimo Pigliucci
- Debates
- Debate Proposals
- Debate Discussion
- Feedback
- Article submissions
- About TPF
- Help
More Discussions
- Dissolving normative ethics into meta-ethics and ethical sciences
- Ethics Series of Discussions - The Ruling Tirpartite Frameworks : Part I, Virtue Ethics
- Buddhism and Ethics: How Useful is the Idea of the 'Middle Way' for Thinking About Ethics?
- "The Ethics of Eating Meat" -- why is that a question of ethics? It's a question of kindness.
- Other sites we like
- Social media
- Terms of Service
- Sign In
- Created with PlushForums
- © 2025 The Philosophy Forum