We are Human thus Imperfect therefore our opinions are imperfect
  • Bill Bisco
    1
    Axiom 1: We are Human
    Axiom 2: Humans have a subjective view of objective Reality
    Axiom 3: Humans are imperfect

    Therefore:

    Argument 1: Our notions, opinions, and perspectives on objective Reality are imperfect
    Argument 2: Our notions, opinions, and perspectives on objective Reality must be incorrect or lacking to some degree
    Argument 3: Some of our notions, opinions, and perspectives may align with objective Reality to some degree, but we cannot know with certainty that they do

    Are there are any good books, treatises, or articles that talk about this general area?
    Bill Bisco Options
  • Terrapin Station
    13.8k
    What would you say are the criteria for perfection?
    Terrapin Station Options
  • Mww
    4.9k
    I wasn’t asked, but nonetheless: if by “perfection” of a thing it is meant the ascension to the “perfect” idea of that thing, than the formal criterion for “perfection” would be that for which a change in the thing is not impossible.
    Mww Options
  • SophistiCat
    2.2k
    ↪Bill Bisco
    I wouldn't put it past a philosopher to write a book about something so utterly banal and obvious, but why would you want to read it?
    SophistiCat Options
bold
italic
underline
strike
code
quote
ulist
image
url
mention
reveal
youtube
tweet
Add a Comment

Welcome to The Philosophy Forum!

Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.

Sign In Create Account

Categories