I believe that there is a fallacy in believing that one's childhood religious beliefs are wrong simply because those were the beliefs instilled in us when we were young. I agree with John Hick wherein one should be suspicious of instilled religious beliefs. This does not mean, though, that I advocate for turning away from those beliefs simply because of the suspicion; I think it is important to question the beliefs that you were raised in and come to the conclusion yourself to decide whether or not you truly believe it. Continuing from this, I am not saying that if one chooses to change their beliefs from that of their childhoods that they must turn away from religion completely. There are other denominations of religions (and other religions) to explore that may more align with the beliefs you hold currently. Different Christian dominations also have different ways for adults to reaffirm their childhood religious beliefs—for Catholics, there's Confirmation, and in other denominations, there are baptisms or second baptisms—showing that these institutions themselves encourage a questioning to make sure these beliefs are truly the ones for you.

Individually, the different variations of the “Elsewhere, Elsewhen” objection I’ve come across are weak in nature. Xenophanes of Colophon's, for example, claims that different animals (if they were able to have the capacity for it) would describe God differently—as looking similarly to them (ex. a horse would imagine God as horse-looking). This, however, does not disprove the fact that God could exist. God could be interpreted differently based on the circumstances. As with Christians and Muslims, their "God" is different in practice and doctrines, but could possibly be the same God. Depending. The same could be said about the lion God and the horse God and the oxen God. And God is depicted as human by humans, but God could not even look like us. Xenophanes is right in that fact that we draw God to better appeal and relate to us. However, Dante in Paradiso depicts God as simply light—a trinity of light and fire. There is no shape to God, but we interpret God as we see fit. In the end, we worship "God" how we choose to, and simply because certain practices are different doesn't mean we do not ultimately pray to, worship, and respect the same deity.