I think if you are in a position to do something, and then you don't you still have the responsibility for the outcome of events. — wax
I think consequentialism requires us to be omniscient which is impossible. — TheMadFool
The dilemma where you have the power to divert a runaway rail truck so that it would kill one person, rather than stay on its course of killing multiple people. — wax
This is the trolley problem, except I presume we are killing the truck operator who arguably has some fault in letting this situation come about. The trolley problem usually involves the death of one or multiple total innocents, and thus is more of a pure moral dilemma.The dilemma where you have the power to divert a runaway rail truck so that it would kill one person, rather than stay on its course of killing multiple people. — wax
This would cause war with the robots and possibly end humanity. A robot would have to attempt to imprison everybody in the equivalent of padded zoo cell to keep them safe. Pregnancy would be prevented since it carries the significant chance of harm.I like Asimov's first law of robotics:"A robot may not injure a human being, or through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. "
Positing unknowns is useless. The guy saving the world from the apocalypse is more likely to be in the larger group. Maybe the apocalypse is exactly what the world needs.What if the person killed would've saved the world from the apocalypse? — TheMadFool
By this argument, it is moral to disassemble a healthy person to distribute organs to multiple people in mortal need of them. On a more practical standpoint, this argument holds water. Take 20 people in need of 20 different organs and too far down the waiting list to survive. They draw lots and one of them gives his healthy parts to the 19 others. This makes so much sense (even if I was one of them), that I don't see why it isn't done.Group A: we should kill one to save the many
The law is indeed on the side of doing nothing. Saving 20 lives at the cost of one different life is a punishable offense.TP-B - If you drop the fat guy off the bridge, you will probably be, rightly, prosecuted for and convicted of murder. Are you willing to spend 20 years in jail for you moral convictions? — T Clark
The guy saving the world from the apocalypse is more likely to be in the larger group. — noAxioms
This would cause war with the robots and possibly end humanity. A robot would have to attempt to imprison everybody in the equivalent of padded zoo cell to keep them safe. Pregnancy would be prevented since it carries the significant chance of harm. — noAxioms
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.