This is an empirical, logical outline of the current environmental (ecological) situation on Earth. I will not elaborate on any point because the internet (full of insane people) will not comprehend the argument to its fullest extent, but i will give enough so that you comprehend what i mean. Writing in prose is more effective than writing in diagrams, logical deductions, or drawings because people will be able to fill in the subtle logical fill in the blanks where necessary (the whole).

In the agricultural sector we have:
Forest removal and management, this reduces CO2 capture and biodiversity, while facilitating wildcrafted organics which are not sustainable, etc.
Fisheries management is adapting to more sustainability oriented regulations, aquacultures and aquaponics may or may not even be necessary..
Invasive species are not exactly helpful but perhaps we can find a good use for them at times (probably by accident)
Animal ethics is not working out in the CAFOs, the chinese experiments, etc.
Meat consumption (eg China) is just going up, complicating all of this
Desertification or topsoil erosion is just creating a low soil fertility situation which anybody who knows even a little bit about soil biology knows is not helpful or the right way to do agriculture
Basically the last point reduces to seeing the high tech, high efficiency, high capital, large scale, chemically based agriculture based on conglomerization (basically monopolies) as not being effective, farmers have lost knowledge about plant breeding etc and instead rely at times on IPR based seed saving techniques etc because the market and current paradigm of agriculture supports that model, subsidies for “cheap food” (in the short term, as is the trend of this whole unsustainable model) do not help
Greenwashing within the alternative agriculture sector does not help, labeling and certification trends just complicate things providing more choice in an unhelpful and vagueness inducing way, the consumer as an individual feels responsible to use a lower energy washing cycle when they really need to change things from the top down policy wise
Globalized trade for development standards based on population increase after some seeming decolonization is just making this worse - everybody wants processed food, dams, lots of meat, more urban sprawl, year round non-local produce, etc.

In the energy sector:
We find we are reliant on limited fossil fuel technology which only creates more of the problematic emissions and unsustainable supply-chain model
This feeds into the transportation, industrial, agricultural, etc sectors

The effects of the above:
Pollution (eg in the past it would be the creation of a superfund site or the enactment of a bill to clean up waterways or whatever), such as plastic waste, unsustainable trash dumps, effluent waste, soil pollution, and air pollution. These are all public health concerns especially in lower GDP less developed countries where populations live in slums (“environmental justice” concerns)
We find changing global temperature patterns, ice melt, sea rise, and changing weather patterns, none of which are helpful
Ecology begins to change, eg bee or mammal extinctions
There is a struggle to remove ourselves from the neomarxist developmental scheme

So we should:
Geoengineer more carbon capture (even from sustainable agriculture) and other things, plan cities better (single stream recycling, water use, greywater use, rainwater collection, urban & vertical farming, etc.), make the energy grid more efficient, research renewable energy more, eliminate toxic waste/clean up, educate on nutrition/population increase (how many kids to have) (because we cant just force policy on them in the modern ideologically secular world), apply regulation *as necessary,* incentivize sustainable solutions on a much larger scale, scale up sustainable agriculture by changing the supply-chain and production model (increasing market share, reducing prices of sustainable food compared to processed food, etc.), mine more sustainably, research things like fracking more before just doing them, minimize oil spills, not install huge neomarxist pipelines for no good reason, etc…

I welcome debate. Go ahead.