And here's the crucial part. If the computer, who randomly opens one of the other two doors you didn't choose, reveals the car, the program terminates right there, and starts again. If on the other hand, the computer opens one of the other doors, and by chance it is a goat, the program continues and you are given a choice to switch or not.
My question is, in this simulation of the Monty Hall show, with this extra random variation where the computer doesn't "know" which door contains the goat or car, but reveals a goat in one of the other doors by chance, is the probability still 2/3 that the other unopened door contains the car? Or does the probability change because of the extra random process? — Purple Pond
Is that (that it didn't remove your guess) a reason not to switch? Note that the computer in this case knows, as monty Hall does, what the right answer is, and always removes wrong answers. — unenlightened
Yes. It seems fairly intuitive in this case, and the only reason i brought it up is that it illustrates another feature of Monty's knowledge that is somewhat forgotten but necessary. - that Monty knows not only where the car is, but also what your choice is and responds selectively to both. — unenlightened
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.