- @Mark DennisFirst question; is the Stoic Dichotomy of control, complete? What I mean by this; is it correct to say that we only have control over some aspects and not others? I suppose what I'm noticing is that; while outcomes are for the most part out of our control, our faculties and our choices are some what a contributing factor to outcomes.
Second question; is stoicism compatible with systems theory? I have taken stoicism deep into the heart of my application of pragmatism but I'd be very curious to hear what you think about what you feel are potential shortcomings of stoicism. Is there a scenario you can think of where a stoic approach is problematic? Pros and cons of stoicism?
Third question; for those practicing stoicism who greatly recognise the need for role models but don't know where to begin in finding a role model. How should one evaluate potential role models? Maybe you could also share a small list of female Stoics you believe are good role models, other than Julia Galef?
I would like for us to focus on the above three questions in particular; however I am a prolific questioner and inquirer, so I do have others which I wanted to ask but these are completely optional and time allowing and are as follows: What does it really mean to be temperate? What is the Stoic perspective on emotion and application of emotion? What are the social and societal duties of a philosopher and an ethicist? How compatible are Stoicism and Taoist Universalism? What does a good philosopher look like? What do they believe/say/do?
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.