• TheMadFool
    13.8k
    If I'm correct, the release of a new version of a popular gadget, like the iPhone, causes a stir among would-be buyers and I've heard that people line up outside stores in long queues days before the actual release of the new model.

    Is there an explanation for this behavior? The essential difference between an old phone, even if working well, and a new phone is that the new one is, in technological parlance, updated: it's OS can handle new apps, better cameras, increased user-friendliness, etc. So, the compulsion to buy the latest version of the iPhone is simply the belief that it has features that are more able to cope with the technological environment which presumably changes on a yearly basis. In effect this behavior of compulsive buying of the latest model of gadgets has psychological underpinnings; the need to update oneself to keep pace with technology.


    Setting aside the issue that the idea of updating technology maybe nothing more than a marketing gimmick let's at least appreciate the fact that the psychological drive to give up the old for the new is real and active in the world's population for a good reason: the old loses its relevance.

    Now contrast what I said above with what can be spoken of as ancient wisdom: the collective body of knowledge of our forefathers. While I won't go so far as to say that all ancient wisdom is irrelevant to the modern world, there are some old ideas that have persisted despite being completely at odds with recent discoveries. I'm particularly concerned about religion and how resistant it is to being "updated". All the major religions have retained their original form with almost zero alterations and that too despite countless generations of humans experiencing radical changes in their lives and minds. Now, I'm fairly sure that the urge to buy the new updated iPhone is not at all alien to the imams, rabbis, priests, lamas, shamans, or other religious figures in the modern world. Yet these same religious folks, despite facts (science mainly) clearly demonstrating the errors of their religious doctrines, insist on clinging to ancient beliefs that are zealously guarded from anyone who may wish to alter them to suit the modern world.
  • Brett
    3k


    It’s quite clear, they’re subtly jumping ship.

    Edit: sorry, changing horses.
  • god must be atheist
    5.1k
    Religions are codified in ancient, unchanging scripts.

    iPhone OS is codified in C++, and constantly updated.

    If religious scripts had been written in an AI fashion using some computer program or even just a similar type of self-changing script, they would be updated, too.

    In a Simpsons episode Spinoza beats Jimi Hendrix in ping pong in a match in heaven, and a passing God with Homer on his side, comments, "don't get discouraged, Homer; 9 out of ten new religions fail in their first year of operation." This, in response to Homer retunring to church-going on sundays, and sleeping through the entire ceremony loudly snoring loudly and obnoxiously, dreaming the sequence in heaven (apparently and facetiously meant as a new devinely inspired form of worship.)

    For those who are not in the know: Jimi Hendrix made a passing remark on a talk show that since everything is electric, maybe they should make an electirc church. This interview was recorded around the same time that he published the record album that shook the world and took it by storm, "Electric Ladyland".
  • god must be atheist
    5.1k
    Some religions get updated. Not often, but they do. "The Book of Mormon" is one example, as is "The New Testament" and "the Holy Koran".
  • Nils Loc
    1.4k
    The basic kernal on which religions are built will never change.

    There is a good way to do things and a bad way to do things. There are vastly more bad ways of doing things than there are good ways of doing things.

    The way of doing things is naturally conserved, especially in a resource scarce world. Lots of suffering helped to shape the way. It's also conserved by virtue of being raised on it, being conditionally accepted by conformity to it.

    Furthermore institutions (monarchs, theocracies, et cetera) conserve their power through ideologically based laws. The state is like your family's father, with the power to deal out punishments and rewards.

    We no longer have to believe by threat of violence or group acceptance... or do we? It's just tribal in-group out-group status seeking bullshit that life is about, whether religious or consumer.

    Apple is a cult! Now that you are in you have to give up audio jacks and usb ports and updatable RAM. Fuck Apple.
bold
italic
underline
strike
code
quote
ulist
image
url
mention
reveal
youtube
tweet
Add a Comment

Welcome to The Philosophy Forum!

Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.