What about mentally ill people and those with personality disorders?We all have on average the same nervous system, the same type of brain, the same intellectual and emotional profile
This is exceedingly obvious and doesn't need to be stated in my opinion.Making sure that populations are empowered by education to reach maximum achievement rather than hampered by an inadequate system is also an important concern. Enhancing medical treatment and technology in general is vital to the prospects for quality of life.
is somewhat interesting.Assuring we do not destroy ourselves with our own technological development is a salient dilemma.
You are really making quite a claim there. Being deprived of social media might be devastating to one person but not to another. I think you must mention privations.what detracts from one life detracts from every life in approximately equal measure.
Are you saying that people have not acted within institutions to bring about changes in social norms or to change those institutions until less than one lifespan ago? I don't really have any idea what you're trying to say here.Commonalities of need informing civilized social relationships and the mechanisms of institutions have obtained for roughly ten thousand years, while the window of time within which human decision-makers must exercise themselves to apply and augment social factors in institutional contexts is only a few generations at the most, a fraction of the single lifespan.
evolutionary relativism
You cannot say this in a scholarly essay.to cover their asses
Where did this come from? Why are you just mentioning it at the end of the essay?prevent this rampant destructiveness
Contemporary thinkers may have duped their audience and perhaps even themselves into the impression that harmonizing the epistemology of evolutionary relativism with universal ethics is much harder than it actually is. — Enrique
a. What exactly does evolutionary relativism mean?
b. What does universal ethics mean? — Tilla
you need to keep in mind that objectivity and subjectivity are mutually exclusive. Claiming that evolutionary processes are subjective to humans means that it is not objectively true. — Tilla
you make in that passage claims about survival of single people, and then jump to the pleasure of people depending on the survival of everyone in the universe. You have an huge gap there, why should anyone care about the survival of someone in some far away country on your account? — Tilla
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.