Philosopher’s always quarrel on whether or not morality exists. I argue that morality does exist, it is harmonious or dis-harmonious mind.

Morality is a subject that’s thought to do with ‘oughts’ and ‘wants’, but through various new studies, I have found it to be something different. Morality is related to will, and structure of universe or ‘simulation’, we can think harmoniously with the local universe having familiarized ourselves with universe phenomena. Good is harmonic activity, such as overall growth and not overall waste on a planet.

Earth’s day and night cycle creates times where the Sun is risen on alternating sides; if you want to plant a seed, tonight is a good time. In this example you are harmonizing with the universe phenomena; you have anticipated and used the ‘goodness’ of time. Arguing that morality doesn’t exist is equally denying that any harmony can be attained; such as by planting a seed ~at the right time.

Morality is a concept where phenomena are akin of, or bound to, other phenomena with health. For example, humans can be family-orientated in harmony with the solar system, or defect and be parasitical to their home planet.

The parent planet is at risk from more advanced children who defect from family and neglect their own habitat; the children can be moral, negating the risk.

Morality is innate, but beneficent theory; spurring from the mind but sensibly; objectives and obstacles intelligence. Morality is thinking as, or as a member of the universe; for the planet we’re akin to. There is no ultimate good and evil, there is no singular harmony, but there are good things we can do; there is the possibility of some harmony. Per se, the habitat can be sustained, nothing is ordering us to, unless we rely on fear of the unknown, but this harmony is attainable and desirable to any liver – the universe is expanding in this order.

Morality is evidently possible to concieve from animals and their production of feces. A lot of people like buttocks, which is analogous to people 'getting close to sin'.

Feces is beneficent matter but I'm claiming that the good feces phenomenon is symbolic of good and evil in nature.

Evil is usually thought equal to good but it's less than feces in comparison, if literally feces is good.

Logically, for expelling fecal matter, humans prove morality; we do harmonize with, for example, hunger; food runs through our biology, and then we release the fecal matter. Consumption to fecal matter shows that naturally things cycle and complete cycles, so feces is just a completed cycle; which when put into perspective next to the act of cycling and completing, is nothing but Earth fodder.

An argument against this is an argument for, well, shit.

To conclude, morality is a concept regarding harmony, dis-harmony or defection of simulation. Good and evil are core, opposite thoughts we can have about phenomena we are physically related to.