There are many things we hold valuable. Family, friends, possesions. But why do we hold them valuable? Is there something integral to these things which creates inherit value? This question is important to ask if you ever care to sell something, since you can put a price on a value to gain something. (Economist aswell as does that sell their words in discussions) ((This discussion will attribute the "will" the "soul" and the "chatacter" of a human to their brain. This might be slightly incorrect since we have neurons outside of the brain, or greatly incorrect if you believe in the previously stated objects to be seperate, in the later case i can not derecommendate this post to you enough))

A. Is it not true that the dead and unborm hold no values? Therefor only the living create evaluations of objects. What do the living posses that allow them cette evaluation? The soul, the spirit, the brain? Is it not the brain that decides all our decisionmaking? Must it not here again be the cause of evaluation?

B. How now does the brain envoke the rest of the body to move (/change)? It sends signals to organs to put the body into a new state. This may happen through adrenalin, to give us a flight or fight response or through other Hormons and systems. It though ends with the expression of an emotion. Emotion as in its etymology: the thing avoking motion.

C. If it is this state of emotion that makes us act, and only it that makes us act, isn't the deciciv factor for our reaction the intensity as in the amount of emotion? If we feel enough hunger what could make us refuse to eat? Well if we feel enough shame, or fear, or if we are buisy lusting after something else we may not eat. So then it is the most intense emotion that decides our action. All our priorisation then stems from emotion.

D. If we prioritice something over another thing. Doesn't that mean that the value of these objects differs? Since if they were to be equally important (=of value) at that moment, we wouldn't prioritise one thing over the other, would we? So the things we prioritise are the things we hold more valuable. From C we know then that: the things that we feel to be of greater emotion is valuable. (Ex. If I fear i value wisdom. If I am hungry i value nutrition.)

E. If values are defined by emotions. Your emotional state shows you your values. And the emotional state of many people shows us their values. We may define a culture (a set of many people) by similarities in their values, hence similarities in emotions. We then as the culture of philosophers might be classified by our "curiosity".

F. Lastly if the emotion is relieved and our state is altered the value is gone. (If we ate and are filled we value food less.) So it is the things we can't be relieved of that define us as a person over a longer time. It is then what we do when we can't be help not to. To stand up for loved ones. To talk when we ought to be quiet. To question what is held to be true. If one wants to see a change in themselves and their behaviour. One then would seek to confront some emotions to eradicate them or to find new emotion for oneself.

Personal: this idea of having value proportional to emotion is pratical if one cares to understand somebody. We all have our values and act by them. Sometimes we are confused, or atleast I am about the behaviour of somebody. Though in all these situations what estranges me from them is that I don't feel what they feel. To understand somebody one must share values. It is then difficult to understand people from foreign cultures. To eat togheter is a good way to see that we all share atleast a human culture, which includes hunger.

I must say that this whole platform is to me an experiment or experience to see if I may find people of similar values. If one strongly shares values one can form an alliance to fight. & it is that thought of an army surpasing any individual that lets me thing about the value of streangh in numbers.