• creativesoul
    12k
    Saying "this is a hand" while gesturing with one's hand is a meaningful use of language. If one knows that their hands are called "hands", then one knows that one has things called "hands". Hands are the things we call "hands". If one knows that we have things called "hands", one knows that we have hands. If one knows that we have hands, and knows that we call hands "hands", then one surely knows that "this is a hand" is true. The "is true" in the preceding sentence is superfluous here.
  • Michael
    15.8k
    The argument is:

    Here is one hand,
    And here is another.
    There are at least two external objects in the world.
    Therefore, an external world exists.

    I don't understand what you're trying to add to this.
  • creativesoul
    12k


    It was more about Witt's remarks in OC.
bold
italic
underline
strike
code
quote
ulist
image
url
mention
reveal
youtube
tweet
Add a Comment

Welcome to The Philosophy Forum!

Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.