I am surprised that 9% chose "maximum hierarchy". I'm intrigued by this. — Kenosha Kid
I'm also intrigued by that, and would be interested to hear from not only them — Pfhorrest
anyone who voted one of the last two options of the first three questions ("somewhat" or "maximal" authority, hierarchy, or stasis). — Pfhorrest
I'm guessing that those who identify themselves "neither" think that because they don't agree with leftist anarchists / antifa-types or with the alternative right / Trump & QAnon-types, they think they aren't left or right.I'm guessing that it's mostly American-style right-libertarians (who often hate being called "right-libertarians") who are identifying themselves in the "neither" (second largest) or "both" (second smallest) groups. — Pfhorrest
I confess the stasis option is the only one that made no sense to me. I kind of read this as 'gradual progress' but I didn't answer 'maximal change' as 'instanaeous transformation to what I currently think of as the perfect society'. — Kenosha Kid
Do notice that the option "centrist" was missing from the questionnaire. That despised and vilified option by both the left and the right. — ssu
I didn't mean to exclude "centrist" out of any bias toward it (I consider myself a kind of "centrist" in the proper political spectrum, even if I'm "far left" by common standards). Rather, I meant "both" and "neither" to differentiate different possible kinds of "centrists". I think you're probably right that people who are equally "anti-woke" and "anti-MAGA" see themselves as "neither". — Pfhorrest
- "an equal balance of change and stasis" was to mean that you find the status quo about halfway acceptable, a lot of things need to change but also a lot needs to stay the same, and we should be only as quick to make those changes as possible without compromising our due caution to protect what's already good. — Pfhorrest
This assumes that one believes that one's preferences in political things somehow matter.which do you favor — Pfhorrest
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.