Police case number 5680/R/6414/22
Eerik Wissenz <wissenzatgmaildotcom> Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 12:31 PM
To: Viman Tomi POL <TomidotVimanatpoliisidotfi>
But if you are curious how I see police actions in this affair:
Police see some corporate board race starting about share ownership and money laundering and email access and shit.
A bunch of horses are basically retarded. One horse is a mystery box.
Police are just like ... hmm, I'm going to bet against the mystery box.
Someone says (obviously no one actually did, but for literary purposes): Don't you want to see what's in the mystery box before going all in against them, could be just a normal looking horse which may easily win against all these odd looking horses.
Police: Nah, nah, no need to look, anything in a mystery box is clearly nothing to be concerned about.
Socrates: And is life worth living for us with that part of us corrupted that unjust action harms and just action benefits; So one must never do wrong… Nor must one, when wrong, inflict wrong in return, as the majority believe, since one must never do wrong. But verily, gentle Meletus, you should still probably at least see what's in the mystery box, for it is certainly not some trick designed to fool the gullible if you yourself created the mystery box for no discernible reason or motive. And what is there to fear? Certainly you would have no problem trusting to your own faculties that whatever you see in the box will not fool you but provide additional information in your decision to predetermine the result of criminal reports without doing any investigation at all. Seems a dangerous game Meletus.
Police: nah, mystery box we created must stay, we are fully committed to avoid seeing or knowing anything about the horse in the mystery box before deciding they for sure can't can't possibly win, and to bet significantly agains them in a way that creates stakes for us of which no reward function even exists if we be right or wrong.
Socrates: but Constable Meletus, you crass fool! certainly it's an offence to reason and the gods to take on such blind risks, to harm oneself and others, without even there being any benefits to you! How can siding with injustice, or taking such a risk, not even for any benefit of which a avid man may understand the action, but merely it seems on the principle that injustice is preferable to justice. That you do this in the garments of a police officer makes the offence to reason and, I dare say, Hades itself, certainly is all the more destable in the eyes of your peers if you turn out to be wrong in you gamble! All the more baffling Constable Meletus, I must say I truly do not understand. What you seem to say is that injustice must be defended on principle and justice rebuked with significant risks and no benefits to yourself! But how can that be! Say it ain't so Meletus.
Police: Yolo bitches. I grip it and I rip it Socrates. New time new rules. You wouldn't get it. When there's a mystery box that has the potential, once opened, to cause all sorts of troubles, people in our time let it lie, see what happens later: climate change, enabling money laundering, over fishing, destroying forests, gain of function research on dangerous pathogens. We always roll the dice regardless of the risks or whether there's even any benefits to ignoring potential problems down the line. It's called being a baller Socrates, and bigger the unnecessary risks, bigger the balls, higher the views, ca-ching, ca-ching Socrates! We're talking fucking cold, hard, cash, Socrates. But in this case not real cash, at least not for us, just the people laundering money who don't pay us, but some sort of mystical coin none-the-less. — The Official Public Record
Police case number 5680/R/6414/22
Viman Tomi POL <TomidotVimanatpoliisidotfi> Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 7:26 AM
To: Eerik Wissenz <wissenzatgmaildotcom>
Hello Eerik,
The minimum punishment of the crime has to be over 4 months.
”1) häntä epäillään tai hänelle vaaditaan rangaistusta rikoksesta, josta ei ole säädetty lievempää rangaistusta kuin neljä kuukautta vankeutta”
Harassing communication says the following:
“1 a § (13.12.2013/879)
«Viestintärauhan rikkominen»
Joka häirintätarkoituksessa toistuvasti lähettää viestejä tai soittaa toiselle siten, että teko on omiaan aiheuttamaan tälle huomattavaa häiriötä tai haittaa, on tuomittava viestintärauhan rikkomisesta sakkoon tai vankeuteen enintään kuudeksi kuukaudeksi"
Meaning the minimum (which would have to be over 4 months) is a fine. The maximum potential punishment for harassing communication is six months.
Tomi Viman
Senior constable
Central Finland Police Department
Tampere police station
Sorinkatu 12, 33100, Tampere
puh. 0295 445 831 — The Official Public Record
Just got news from my lawyer today that I the 4 year investigation into me for mad crimez I allegedly committed as CEO and board member of a corporation, have been dropped. — boethius
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.