• TazAnastazio
    2
    Synopsis of Infinite Apirism (Infinite Infinitism)

    This concept, "Infinite Apirism," is a philosophical framework that seeks to reconcile seemingly contradictory ideas about existence, intelligence, and purpose by integrating scientific observation with metaphysical reasoning. It proposes a multi-layered reality where different levels of existence, from the physical to the transcendent, can be seen as simultaneously valid and interconnected. The name is derived from "infinite" and the Greek word apiro, which means "infinite, boundless, or unlimited".

    The conceptual journey toward Infinite Apirism began with a thought experiment exploring the mathematical nature of infinity.

    1. The Mathematical Infinity:
    The idea starts with the concept of a line segment with a designated midpoint, which could be infinitely subdivided or extended. This mathematical infinite, which has no practical "border" within its own logic, was then extrapolated to question the limits of matter, energy, and intelligence.

    2. The Clash with Physics and the Limits of Divisibility:
    The extrapolation to the physical world brought the first point of divergence. While the mathematical model suggests infinite divisibility, scientific understanding, particularly quantum physics, indicates that matter and energy are not infinitely divisible. Rather, they are composed of fundamental particles and discrete packets of energy (quanta). This introduces a quantum limit, or a "border," that the mathematical concept of infinity does not acknowledge.

    3. The Challenge of "Why" and the Concept of a Finite God:
    The thought then is shifted to the problem of ultimate origins and purpose. Acknowledging that any finite thing must have an origin, the concept of a finite God was considered—a superior, but bounded, intelligence to whom a "why" or purpose could be attributed. However, this definition presents a logical paradox: a truly infinite entity cannot have a border or be subject to the rules of existence it governs. This distinguishes between a finite, yet superior, intelligence and the ultimate ground of being.

    4. Infinite Consciousness as the Ground of Being:
    This led to the core of the proposed concept: an infinite, unifying consciousness that is the source and ground of all reality. In this framework, "existence" as a bounded state does not apply to the infinite consciousness. Instead, the infinite consciousness simply is, and all finite existence emerges from it. The "why" is not about an external purpose imposed by a designer but an internal, participatory process of the infinite consciousness experiencing itself through its finite forms.

    5. The Synthesis: A Multi-Layered, Multifaceted Reality:
    The final step synthesizes these ideas into a single, cohesive framework. Infinite Apirism proposes a multi-layered reality where different forms of truth are valid at different levels:

    • The Infinite Consciousness: The fundamental, boundless reality from which all else emerges.

    • Supernatural Agents: Finite but superior intelligences, potentially acting with their own purposes, who could be the basis for religious belief systems. Their actions might influence the universe at various scales.

    • Physical Laws as Emergent Properties: The physical laws of the universe, which science observes and describes, are seen as emergent properties of the infinite consciousness. They are the mechanisms through which the inherent, intelligent principle expresses itself.

    • Coexistence of Perspectives: This framework allows for a coexistence of scientific, religious, and metaphysical truths. The scientific explanation of a snowflake's formation, based on chemical laws, is valid on the physical level. At the same time, the underlying reality—the infinite consciousness and its agents—provides a deeper, metaphysical context for why those laws exist at all.

    Conclusion
    Infinite Apirism unifies seemingly disparate truths into a single metaphysical framework. It recognizes both the boundaries of the physical world described by science and the boundless nature of the infinite consciousness from which all things originate and return. By proposing a multi-layered reality, it offers a way to understand existence that is both scientifically informed and philosophically adequate.
  • Astorre
    145


    Something cannot be named, thought, represented, or manifested if it does not have a finite existence. Infinity, as a mathematical model, can only exist as a cognitive construct, not as an independent entity (similar to zero). In my opinion, the concept of "infinite consciousness" is a speculative idea, and here's why: Even when we refer to something as infinite, we are defining it. Defining something is the task of establishing limits or boundaries. I don't know what mathematicians will say about this, but the very concept of "infinity" seems like a logical error, but I agree that it is necessary as an imaginary concept for building other cognitive constructs. I suggest that you define the concept of "infinity" in terms of your approach and the constructs you are developing.
bold
italic
underline
strike
code
quote
ulist
image
url
mention
reveal
youtube
tweet
Add a Comment

Welcome to The Philosophy Forum!

Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.