The only way an observer could see the light beam moving towards him would be if he could see the different phases of the race as they happened. — Hachem
↪fishfry can we be sure it isn’t? — Banno
Imagine looking at racers who go as fast as the speed of light. — Hachem
Imagine looking at racers who go as fast as the speed of light.
The first racer starts running and reaches the position of the second racer who immediately takes off at his maxi — Hachem
until all racers cross the finish line at the same time. — Hachem
IS the way of thinking employed here so different to that employed by idealists or Post modernists or anti-abortionists or second amendment advocates or even Trump supporters? This is why psychoceramics is of philosophical interest. — Banno
What do we say of those who can't see the flaw in lumping all who they disagree with into a single catagory of crackpottery — Hanover
It's the OP who has read about this interesting experiment, and extrapolated some unjustified conclusions about being able to control individual photons — fishfry
This is a very narrow reading of my posts. — Hachem
What would the sensors register if the camera or cameras were placed at the end of the trajectory, instead of on the side? — Hachem
I'd place conspiracy theorists, anti-scientists, and half-brains under the crackpot umbrella — Hanover
Saying, I want a more comprehensive report about 9/11 is different than the crackpot conclusion that GW orchestrated it. — Hanover
You greatly misstate my position. Questioning is not the same as arriving at unsupported and outlandish theories. — Hanover
crackpot — Hanover
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.