Meaning and inanimate objects.
  • Shawn
    13.2k
    How is meaning ascribed to inanimate objects?

    In the span of 1-2h I grew to like and have a mental image of a character I saw on a movie screen. His picture is my avatar. How is this possible for me to have feelings over an inanimate and distant object such as a volleyball inscribed with a hand on it?

    I dare not mentioned iconoclastic images of people, and how that can get them moved.

    So, my question is how is meaning ascribed to inanimate objects and how do we agree on whatever meanings are formed in our head shared collectively by a common name?
    Shawn Options
  • Wheatley
    2.3k
    Maybe the inanimate object can be some sort of symbolism. Why did people used to worship idols? Why do Americans worship the American flag? Because it stands for something.
    Wheatley Options
  • Akanthinos
    1k
    So, my question is how is meaning ascribed to inanimate objects and how do we agree on whatever meanings are formed in our head shared collectively by a common name? — Posty McPostface

    How do you decide you are happy with your signature?
    I have no clue how one would go about defining elegance, but I feel its explanation would go a long way about explaining the question of the OP. How one can go about finding something as practical and pragmatic as a signature elegant?
    Akanthinos Options
  • Noble Dust
    7.9k
    His picture is my avatar. How is this possible for me to have feelings over an inanimate and distant object such as a volleyball inscribed with a hand on it? — Posty McPostface

    Because your feelings are feelings about the aesthetic of the film itself. The film created the context in which the feelings about Wilson evolved. That's an aesthetic experience. The aesthetic is only activated when it touches your personal experience; when it touches you.

    So, my question is how is meaning ascribed to inanimate objects — Posty McPostface

    One way, then, is through the aesthetic.

    how do we agree on whatever meanings are formed in our head shared collectively by a common name? — Posty McPostface

    Not sure what you mean here.
    Noble Dust Options
  • T Clark
    13.9k
    So, my question is how is meaning ascribed to inanimate objects and how do we agree on whatever meanings are formed in our head shared collectively by a common name? — Posty McPostface

    It is common for people, including myself, to be emotionally attached to inanimate objects. In my experience, the process is personification - ascribing the characteristics of people to other living or non-living things. I have always thought, without any specific knowledge, that personification is a process humans developed to bond us to other people. Even so, being the emotionally flexible organisms we are, it is available for application to other things also.

    People love their cars, their houses, the world, their country. Makes sense to me.
    T Clark Options
bold
italic
underline
strike
code
quote
ulist
image
url
mention
reveal
youtube
tweet
Add a Comment

Welcome to The Philosophy Forum!

Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.

Sign In Create Account

Categories