So it follows that we cannot describe NOTHING in positive terms. In other words, we cannot say what nothing is; we can only describe what it is not, which is literally anything.However, unlike most objects (mental/physical) NOTHING is defined in the negative. In fact it is the ultimate negative - the absence of everything.
If "NOTHING" does not exist as an idea, then how are we discussing it? — bioazer
No one ever experiences Nothing. So, in a metaphysics that's about individual experience, there's no such thing. — Michael Ossipoff
What were you before you were born? — TheMadFool
No one ever experiences Nothing. So, in a metaphysics that's about individual experience, there's no such thing. — Michael Ossipoff
"No one ever experiences Nothing. So, in a metaphysics that's about individual experience, there's no such thing." — Michael Ossipoff
What about the experience of loss, lack, dread, angst? Perhaps these experiences point to a primordial preconceptual phenomenal aquantiance with nothing.
— bloodninja
I only want to point to the NOTHINGness of the time before we were born. Perhaps contemplating that state of NOTHING will give us insight into what NOTHING is. — TheMadFool
No one ever experiences Nothing. — Michael Ossipoff
Of course they do, when they are unconscious or asleep and not dreaming. If I may relate, it feels like no duration had transpired. — Rich
"No one ever experiences Nothing". — Michael Ossipoff
Of course they do, when they are unconscious or asleep and not dreaming. If I may relate, it feels like no duration had transpired. — Rich
I didn't say that you don't experience a time after there was nothing. I said that you don't experience nothing ) — Michael Ossipoff
I only want to point to the NOTHINGness of the time before we were born. Perhaps contemplating that state of NOTHING will give us insight into what NOTHING is. — TheMadFool
So I suggest that the timeless sleep at the end of lives is only for those very few life-completed people who have no remaining needs, wants, inclinations or un-discharged consequences. — Michael Ossipoff
‘There would be no hammer’ is badly phrased. It sounds as if the object has ceased to exist, but that is not so; all that has happened is that no-one is now using the object as a hammer. Rather than saying ‘there would be no hammer’, therefore, you should say ‘no-one would be using this object as a hammer’. — Herg
A genius chipmunk with huge prehensile hands could use it to smash an acorn. — Janus
"So I suggest that the timeless sleep at the end of lives is only for those very few life-completed people who have no remaining needs, wants, inclinations or un-discharged consequences". — Michael Ossipoff
This would be very close to the beliefs of some Buddhist sects, with all kinds of possible variations. — Rich
I find most Buddhists who believe this believe it because they were taught it. Being taught is much different from learning from experience. They yield a qualitative different feeling of knowing.
Sure, there are traditions, teachings, about those matters, that go back for millennia. That doesn't discredit them. — Michael Ossipoff
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.