I am saying you are an exemplar of manipulation via hyper-partisan tactics, — Maw
Like when a black lesbian female is given the position of professor over a heterosexual white male simply because she is black, lesbian and female, even though she is less competent than her competition."Encouraging discrimination against white heterosexual males" is propaganda and false?
Can you give an example of this discrimination? — praxis
The thing is though, Democrats pretty much control the Academia and the Media - I mean their narrative is the wider cultural narrative. So when they're in power, they feel that everyone is on their side, so they don't see America as divided. They choose not to listen to others with different views, and they dismiss them as lunatics who don't even deserve to be taken seriously - just like @Maw is trying to dismiss me in this thread.When Obama was President and Democrat views prevailed, no one talked about divided America. — Hanover
So there can't be decent right-wing views? Everything that is right-wing is therefore wrong? And you can parrot about the right-wing all day, but they're not allowed to talk about "The Left" because there is no such thing as "The Left". "The Left" just means all decent people who are right by default - actually, your favorite trick, there is no such unity amongst them to call them "The Left". Really, you've just bought into the mainstream propaganda.You can protest endlessly, but they both pedal right-wing conspiracies, cherry-pick science, and rant about "The Left", albeit in differing degrees. — Maw
Right... that is not discrimination, because they are white and heterosexual on top, so they deserve being fired — Agustino
I think you would agree with me that a quota for a 50/50 split in parliament between men and women is stupid. It shouldnt be based on gender, or race, but on merit and skill. — René Descartes
No. It should be what is best for everyone - if one part of the population can take better decisions because, for whatever reasons, they are the most capable, then they should be the representatives.I think in the case of a parliament it should be representative of the populace. — Michael
No. It should be what is best for everyone - if one part of the population can take better decisions because, for whatever reasons, they are the most capable, then they should be the representatives. — Agustino
Where did I say they should all be tied to big business? — Agustino
Of course, if you listen to people like unenlightened, if you're white, you don't have to worry about being picked on with regards to your skin color on the street... except if you happen to live in Pakistan, or you go through the wrong neighbourhood, etc. — Agustino
So there can't be decent right-wing views? Everything that is right-wing is therefore wrong? — Agustino
And you're an exemplar of what; non-partisan tactics? Convince me there's no "hyper" in your modus operandi. — Noble Dust
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.