In mathematics, the Poincare recurrence theorem states that "a system whose dynamics are volume-preserving and which is confined to a finite spatial volume will, after a sufficiently long time, return to an arbitrarily small neighbourhood of its initial state". — Mustapha Mond
Equally, the oscillating universe theory, originally supported by Einstein, speculates that that the known universe ends in a "big crunch" which is followed by another big bang and another crunch etc. etc. in a process which continues indefinitely. — Mustapha Mond
what is your opinion on multiverse theory; and its possible implications on the points made above? — Mustapha Mond
If I remember correctly, Nietzsche never explicitly endorsed eternal recurrence. He merely used it as a thought experiment. — darthbarracuda
I interpret such ideas as the realisation of being trapped in an endless cycle of repetitive and pointless actions, so it is actually the soul's yearning for release. — Wayfarer
We are striving for nothing precisely because meaning is infinite, invincible, undoubtable to anyone who is paying attention. Far from the nihilistic failure you and Wayfarer (and even some of the wider philosophy Nietzsche) ascribes, eternal recurrence alludes to how striving for meaning is impossible-- meaning is infinite, so it's never lacking such that we could strive for it. — TheWillowOfDarkness
One could posit that evolution didn't account for the fact that humans would end up yearning and searching for meaning, Gods and spirituality; rather than just cracking on and replicating our DNA... — Mustapha Mond
Whatever the metaphysics that may or may not be true, the actual life as we feel it does not change. — Schopenhauer
Our striving-for-nothing is because meaning is inescapable. We can only be who we are. Those who chase the transcendent are quite literally trying to attain nothing-- to stop being themselves, to eradicate their meaning, to become nothing. — TheWillowOfDarkness
I'm talking about the infinite of meaning, not any particular state of a person. — TheWillowOfDarkness
In a sense, the infinite can be said to transcend the world; it's a different realm, unaffected by what happens in the world.
This is not the "transcendent" I'm talking about in my argument though. — TheWillowOfDarkness
The Fundamentalists actually have the more coherent argument here. They understand God to be a worldly state — TheWillowOfDarkness
I interpret this book as suggesting the futility in seeking for fixed point or a Secret. It functions as an anti-Secret, the pseudo-Secret that either there is no secret or that it's not worth the candle. — Who
For me there's a "spiritual" version of nihilism. It's not that everything becomes valueless, but that all value becomes finite and temporary. — Who
The reson I 'don't understand' your posts are that they are totally unintelligible, they don't, and never have, made a lick of sense. The sooner everyone else on this forum realises that, the better off they'll be. — Wayfarer
I interpret such ideas as the realisation of being trapped in an endless cycle of repetitive and pointless actions, so it is actually the soul's yearning for release. — Wayfarer
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.