The affair has a parallel, in that similar instinctual imperatives clearly lie behind mass participation in 'fashion' the 'Kardashians', and even 'animal intercourse'. — Marcus de Brun
We must therefore ask: Is it possible that the un-intellectualized evil-myths perpetuated at the Nuremberg rallies, can be compared to the Capitalist and ecological evils, that are presently perpetuated by the persistence and pervasiveness of the Princess-Prince fairy-tale myth? — Marcus de Brun
Actually this article is boring, since the myth of rights, of sex, of inclusivity: all tire the gentleman of breeding. All pall. — InternetStranger
I don't understand why "prosaic" means "poetry"? Your lack of acumen in language comprehension surprises me. It is, at least clear: the Anglo-Saxon tongue is not your forte! — InternetStranger
What question? — InternetStranger
Can we overcome the pretense to only satisfy psychological needs and wants? — Posty McPostface
It's not patently cogent to say that sex is not psychological, if that's the kind of issue you mean. — InternetStranger
Put another way, if I judge something has happened, I drink water, my psychology is the ground of certainty. Think of the phrase "an enviable lunatic", i.e., someone who takes the greatest pleasure from gaping thoughtfully at a wall, e.g., Leonardo de Vinci. — InternetStranger
Now, one must answer: Why would one want to reach empty "reality" without story or muthos? It is an artificial production of the technology of manipulating the human being as thing. However, it is not cogent that it exists, some say it does, some the reverse, of those serious persons who have carried out an examination of the issue. — InternetStranger
"I'm not talking about sex."
Then what? — InternetStranger
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.