I believe that consciousness arises whenever energy flows through matter or is in matter. — Amadeus
Still, I find it more helpful not to think of everything as conscious, but reactive. The degree and nature of the reactivity varies in scale and complexity. Thus, on such a scale, entities like neutrinos would score very low because they interact with very little and those responses have no flexibility or control. Gradually one could us this approach to consider the increasing complexity of non living things until the emergence of life, then the emergence of multicellular organisms, and now abstractly intelligent ones. — Greta
Does a flexible and controlled response require a mind?
Which inanimate objects have the highest level of reactivity?
At what level of complexity do organisms have awareness? — Galuchat
Answers to the other two are much less clear, although I think it would be fair to say that a mind, or at least qualia, is not essential for a flexible controlled response.Thanks for answering my second question. — Galuchat
I've been doing a lot of thinking on what consciousness is and how it may arise, I'm going to share my ideas and you can feel free to try and disprove them or discuss it further.
So to make his brief, I believe that consciousness arises whenever energy flows through matter or is in matter. Energy flowing or being in different parts of the brain activates different forms of consciousness. No energy flow, similar to when we are asleep means no consciousness.
To further extend on this idea, this would mean that computers would also have to be conscious, since it is indeed energy flowing through matter (the circuits).
Energy flowing in different parts of the computer would give rise to different forms of consciousness (qualia?).
Perhaps I'm wrong but feel free to share your thoughts, thanks in advance. — Amadeus
So what your model is lacking is the distinction between beings and devices. — Wayfarer
My first question would be: What Energy Flow are you referring to? A normal Energy of Science or are you speculating on a new Energy not known to Science?I've been doing a lot of thinking on what consciousness is and how it may arise, I'm going to share my ideas and you can feel free to try and disprove them or discuss it further.
So to make his brief, I believe that consciousness arises whenever energy flows through matter or is in matter. Energy flowing or being in different parts of the brain activates different forms of consciousness. No energy flow, similar to when we are asleep means no consciousness.
To further extend on this idea, this would mean that computers would also have to be conscious, since it is indeed energy flowing through matter (the circuits).
Energy flowing in different parts of the computer would give rise to different forms of consciousness (qualia?).
Perhaps I'm wrong but feel free to share your thoughts, thanks in advance. — Amadeus
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.