Can't point to where I am wrong?

A true statement indeed.

Also, if Mueller's tactic was merely some technical error then he can hardly be trusted as to his competence.

One requires due process to also protect from the dangers of incompetence. — raza

Yes, because you don't make sense most of the time as your brain seems to go into paranoia-overdrive. And the complaint as if people aren't allowed to make mistakes is pathetically elitist and divorced from reality. You've been often pointed out your mistakes, lack of evidence and absence of logic in this thread - I don't need to repeat it here. So you can hardly be trusted as to your competence. Is that it?

You've allowed your opinion of me to affect your analysis of my words, I feel.

The evidence of this is your personal vitriol.

And the complaint as if people aren't allowed to make mistakes — Benkei

Not such potentially deadly "mistakes" as those who have such powers ("elite" powers) as Mueller.

Due process has some protection from such "mistakes".

The remedy should be obvious. Indict AND allow such due process as 'discovery'

Without the two together is a description of tyranny.

You do like to play the victim too as evidenced by about half of your posts, of which this is just another example.

Even those people are allowed mistakes and it's precisely because of that possibility that the law has remedies for it. A conspiracy or isn't.

"You've allowed your opinion of me to affect your analysis of my words, I feel.

The evidence of this is your personal vitriol."

You do like to play the victim too as evidenced by about half of your posts, of which this is just another example. — Benkei

You would like to think I am a victim but it is merely an observation of your state as expressed in your words.

Examples: "paranoia-overdrive"
"divorced from reality"
"pathetically elitist"


This is an exhibition of a juvenile state of emotion. A defensive reaction when intellectually challenged.

Even those people are allowed mistakes — Benkei

There is no excuse for such a "mistake" when you are talking about a team of operatives and lawyers.

It is just not feasibly possible that such an entire sophisticated entity could be so clumsy. It's political gamesmanship and the bluff was simply called out.

These people are intelligence and political operatives with many collective years of spying, counter spying and audience manipulation.

One has to be particularly naive to not realize the game. The naivety factor is the companion of juvenile states of consciousness.

One has to be particularly naive to not realize the game. The naivety factor is the companion of juvenile states of consciousness. — raza

Please lecture me on the finer points of politics, oh infallible wise one.

Please lecture me on the finer points of politics, oh infallible wise one — Benkei

More examples of a juvenile state. A state that also tends to believe the dogma of it's religion, that of Statism. Mueller seems to be the current leader of a statist cult.

Mueller seems to be the current leader of a statist cult. — raza

What the hell are you on about???

This dude is a straight up moron, that's it.

There's been a triggering! Toys thrown from cots!

Either that or a troll. Regardless, someone just ban him. He hasn't contributed in the slightest and is just wasting everyone's time with his crap.

Yes. If by triggered, you mean, frustrated that somehow, claiming that Mueller (the man who most likely cost Clinton the throne, by the way) being the head of a Statist cult doesnt send you into deep shame at your intellectual inadequacies.

How many more of your claims do you need properly debunked before you admit that whatever motivates you to post here, well, it isnt a search for a rational argument?

Waste of your time.

Yes. If by triggered, you mean, frustrated that somehow, claiming that .... — Akanthinos

What the hell are you on about??? — Akanthinos

Is that the appropriate tone, do you think, for asking a question? This is why I used the triiger term.

Mueller (the man who most likely cost Clinton the throne, by the way) — Akanthinos

Feel free to posit your theory.

Regardless, someone just ban him. — Maw

Calling all fellow goons. Calling all fellow goons. We appear to have someone stepping out of line.

Narrative alert! Narrative alert! There is a subordinate among us. Eliminate! Eliminate!

Bubble protection code activated!

Our insecurity team is under attack! Defend! Defend!

you're not coherent enough to make anyone here feel insecure. It's just boorish talking to someone who doesn't have the capacity for self reflection. You'd be wise to stop the trolling unless you want to self destruct.

You'd be wise to stop the trolling unless you want to self destruc — Benkei

You're really scary dude.

"Troll" is certainly an opinion that could be discussed. "Troll", as I understand it to infer, is when one doesn't necessarily stand with their words.

I stand with my opinion about the rationale behind the Mueller investigation. Others simply disagree, then some react in an emotional fashion in their disagreement, and then I simply point to the structure used which shows the reactive emotional elements in play.

"Troll" suggests I am playing you, but I am merely illuminating the play itself.

We'll leave it up to Chairman Mueller whether or not to send raza to the gulag. All hail CM!

I stand with my opinion about the rationale behind the Mueller investigation. — raza

Your opinion on the matter has never been the problem. Your inability to engage arguments and to produce evidence is. The fact you confuse people pointing out your inabilities with an irrational attack on your opinion is what is playing the victim is all about (I'm different and everybody hates me for it. Sob. Whine.). So we're wasting our time on trollish behaviour obviously as you've demonstrated not to be interested in substantive argument and that's why I don't like you and am less interested in taking your delicate sensibilities into account and will say that considering Mueller as the head of a Statist cult is more paranoia again.

Edit: correction. That was still too considerate. That statement was straight out of the playbook for ramblings of a mad man.

That's a long post to describe what amount of time you are wasting of yourself.

Any more?

...someone just ban him — Maw

Chairman Mueller has determined that seeing as we're in the lounge, a certain amount of insanity is allowable, so due to HIS glorious clemency, raza escapes the gulag. All hail!

Chairman Mueller has determined that seeing as we're in the lounge, a certain amount of insanity is allowable, so due to HIS glorious clemency, raza escapes the gulag. All hail! — Baden

What would be the accusation to presumably act upon in such a way ("ban") if we're not in "the lounge"?

I am afraid we are too far off-topic to pursue this line of inquiry. Please send any further queries directly to chairmanmuelleratstatistcultdotorg . Or read the guidelines. Now, on with Donald Trump...

How convenient.

It's statistcult.gov, not org.

My bad.