So yes or no, you'd say that naive realism can be something other than what the people who call themselves naive realists believe? — Terrapin Station
Naive realism is not a commitment to any particular truth theory. So it's going to be compatible with any approach to truth theory. — Terrapin Station
Again, it's irrelevant if you believe it entails a particular account to truth — Terrapin Station
Entailment is always belief. — Terrapin Station
I explained it in detail above in my back and forth with Michael. Views aren't governed or delimited by what some set of individuals who don't hold the view believe is logically entailed by the view, where what they believe is logically entailed isn't something that the view-holders have expressed as the view.It would depend on the conception of God you are concerned with and whether the logic of that conception is compatible with the logic of free will, determinism or both. I don't see what point you are trying to make. — John
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.