Science could never discover the existence of some supernatural being, so to the extent someone claims God is a supernatural being, science cannot discover the existence of such a being before religion, because, as a matter of course, science refrains from all supernatural claims. — LD Saunders
Let just say there is an actual Creator. Who do you think will find it first, science or religion? — Jeremiah
Let just say there is an actual Creator. Who do you think will find it first, science or religion? — Jeremiah
That is absolutely FALSE. Science does not even waste time investigating supernatural claims. — LD Saunders
If someone tells you that there is an angel in the room, a scientist is not going to do something like shine a flashlight in the room to see if an angel shows up, because the concept of an angel is that it is a non-material, supernatural being, and science, as a matter of course, as a matter of definition, only examines things that are material. — LD Saunders
Not a single science department at any major western university would agree with your claims you've stated here. — LD Saunders
What I stated is a fact. — LD Saunders
I'm done trying to explain what essentially every beginning science student learns within the first two weeks of class. — LD Saunders
I'm done trying to explain what essentially every beginning science student learns within the first two weeks of class. Carry on with your misconception of science. Just realize that people who actually know science do not agree with you. — LD Saunders
Not a single science department at any major western university would agree with your claims you've stated here. — LD Saunders
Yet, for some reason, people seem to be concerned with what scientists think about the existence of God. — LD Saunders
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.