:D

This said, what we all suffer are the infamous filter bubbles where different people end up thinking the same and recognizing the same (fictional) reality. — DiegoT

How do you tell in which bubble someone is in? What bubble you're in? How do you reach people in bubbles other than your own? I think that background is key.

Trump is a proto-hitler: he's maniac enough, but has none of the other necessary qualities. — tim wood

Just how, really, is Trump a "proto-Hitler"?

I don't find anything similar with Hitler when looking at Trump. Has Trump had any kind of ideology and even written a book about it? No, and the art of the deal was written by a ghostwriter who isn't proud of it. War veteran? No. Somebody who has huge megalomaniac visions for his country? No.

Even to say that Trump is the American version of Berlusconi would be far more appropriate, yet Silvio actually came from a middle class family and didn't inherit his wealth.

This is just slapping a term used as a swearword on Trump without any thinking behind it. Just like people put the label "Marxist" on leftist politicians on the other side without any contemplation on what actually Marxism is about.

Drink the Kool Aid peasants!

I don't find anything similar with Hitler when looking at Trump. Has Trump had any kind of ideology and even written a book about it? No, and the art of the deal was written by a ghostwriter who isn't proud of it. War veteran? No. Somebody who has huge megalomaniac visions for his country? No. — ssu

How do you know that Trump has no megalomaniac visions? This type of person keeps one's visions a secret. That's how deception works, by hiding one's intentions. Trump does it by throwing up a wall of confusion, casting the image that there are no specific goals underneath, that he's confused, will let others lead, and he'll just go with the flow. Don't let that fool you, the goals are there. He's done this all his life.

All the vile shit is surfacing and now needs to be flushed down the drain. I'm actually glad we have Trump as president so this cult of fear and paranoia can finally be adequately addressed by the appropriate governing entities like the FBI and a slumbering and rudderless intelligentcia of the nation.

I hope this festering sore cult group of Trump supporters get a much needed reality check.

Oh, yeah, and the racism needs to be evacuated also.

This user has been deleted and all their posts removed.

the two things I most like about Trump, is that he prevented Clinton from being president; and also his sense of humour. I totally love sense of humour in people who are under huge pressure; it tells me that they are intelligent and rational. Not sarcasm and vitriolic insults to prompt "yes, me too hate who you hate", but real humour. Trump has a sense of self-deprecating humour that I find very civilized.

Yeah, you have to also remember his joke on his supporters about shooting someone in broad daylight and them still glorifying and praising him even after the fact.

It really goes to show what a likeable and caring person he is.

Perhaps you will accept this challenge. Trump commuted the life sentence of Alice Johnson - a good thing. A very good thing which likely could be replicated thousands of more times, pardoning people who have been in prison for too long under mandatory drug sentencing guidelines. — tim wood

I mean even Hitler helped Bloch and some other Jews he personally knew and liked.

that comment was not a call to shoot anybody. If you go to the original quote in context, it was a mere use of exageration (the basis of humour together with irony) to express how loyal was his electorade. If you remove the context and the human faculty for communicating and understanding humour, yes, it is horrible!

All presidents have showed some sense of humour, and that´s something very commendable about the U.S.A. presidential institution.

This user has been deleted and all their posts removed.

I don't find anything similar with Hitler when looking at Trump. — ssu

Then you must simply not be looking hard enough. Hmm, what possible similarities could there be between a white, male, racist, xenophobic, authoritarian-style leader, with a penchant for hyperbole and inflammatory rhetoric, and who calls the media the enemy of the people, and Hitler?

Yes, isn't he just adorable? Don't you just want to go over and ruffle the little lad's hair like that? What harm could he possibly cause?

:roll:

Then you must simply not be looking hard enough. Hmm, what possible similarities could there be between a white, male, racist, xenophobic, authoritarian-style leader, with a penchant for hyperbole and inflammatory rhetoric, and who calls the media the enemy of the people, and Hitler?

Are you serious S? White is a colour, like the skin of albino types in Africa that are killed to perform traditional African rites. Trump´s skin is not exactly that colour. Perhaps you mean he looks European? Like Hitler, but also like Einstein or Erasmus of Rotterdam or Marion Cotillard or Rafa Nadal? Male is a sexual condition, that Trump shares with half of our species (and many other species). We must need males, or Mother Nature would not make that huge investment. Racist means nothing, like xenophobic. These are words that don´t describe reality, they are only a stone thrown at people. Authoritarian-style is one possible style of management, perfectly legal and acceptable so far as it is carried out under the law. As for hyperbole and inflammatory rhetoric; in comparison with whom? Who do you think, among the politicians and communicators criticizing Trump today, is moderate and conciliatory?

Hitler was vegetarian, had a taste for classical music, believed in protecting natural parks with laws, and like Walt Disney or myself, loved Bavaria. What do we say to people who share these interests with the ultimate evil dictator? Are they suspicious? S, please do not use reductio ad hitlerum. It´s not a rational argument.

This user has been deleted and all their posts removed.

If I have flaws in reasoning I do want to know; it´s obvious I have failed in detecting them. What is "my kind of violence"? I have not defended any kind of violence in any post.

Trump is clearly an authoritarian - in the bad sense - racist, fascististic bully-boy of whom the kindest and gentlest thing that can be said of his performance as president is that he simply does not have a clue. No clue at all. — tim wood

And this is a huge issue here. You see, Trump started with the dream any President would have, a Congress that his party dominated, which itself was totally shellshocked from his candidacy and election victory and totally. Imagine what a authoritarian who wasn't as inept could have done.

Even the whole Russia debacle would have been confined to a scandal pondered among the intelligence circles and later historians would likely not have become an issue if moron Trump wouldn't have personally made it an unavoidable result with firing Comey and then personally admitting that he did because of the Russia investigation. The fact is that otherwise the FBI would have made a report that, Yep, Russia was active, and that would have been end of that and ended a year ago or so.

Hence the inability of Trump makes the Hitler reference, even if you talk about a Proto-Hitler, highly dubious in my view. Or simply just uninformative. Bush Jr came and went and got us the Patriot Act, but that didn't turn the US into the Anglo-version of the Third Reich. Basically Trump's narcissist egotism and ineptness makes it impossible for someone like Dick Cheney to operate behind the curtains.

Perhaps you will accept this challenge. Trump commuted the life sentence of Alice Johnson - a good thing. A very good thing which likely could be replicated thousands of more times, pardoning people who have been in prison for too long under mandatory drug sentencing guidelines.

A good thing. He did a good thing. Name another good thing Trump ever did. Can you? — tim wood

UUUuuuhhh.... that's a hard one, Tim.

A person with so little of agenda of his own (except his egotism and self promotion) is a hard one, especially if it's even so that "the Wall"-thing was basically made up by his staff to get him to remember to talk about border security. The ignorance of Trump can be seen from his suprise that the chant "Drain the swamp" gathered so much support for him. The thing is, this person is very clueless.

Anything positive? Basically when he got to power, the generals he took to his cabinet with the exception of Flynn weren't such a bad option. Typically a GOP President would have picked lobbyists and clueless neocon politicians to the positions (which actually fill the seats now), but Trump picked highly appreciated generals to the spots for some unknown reason. Kelly for the position of secretary for homeland security (and not the Chief-of-Staff-Nanny) wasn't actually a bad pick, because Kelly had prior been the commander of SOUTHCOM, hence he understood well the situation in Latin America. Mattis was a respected general and McMaster had actually written a book "Dereliction of Duty" how the Joint Chiefs of Staff went along with LBJ and McNamara to the Vietnam war. These generals were basically nonpolitical government employees, naturally favouring the "normal" geopolitics that the US armed forces is for.

Are you serious, S? — DiegoT

Yes, are you? I can barely believe the lengths to which you're willing to drag your apologetics.

(By the way, you can quote someone by highlighting the text, then clicking the 'quote' button that pops up).

This user has been deleted and all their posts removed.

This user has been deleted and all their posts removed.

As such they're not just a red herring, they're a red whale. Are you getting the idea? — tim wood

But what about all the other big mammals? Elephants, hippos, giraffes. And red isn't the only colour. There are other colours too. My favourite colour is blue. Also, whales aren't as pretty as flamingos.

thank you, I did not know how to do it!

A word, in my understanding, is defined by the use in context that speakers of a language apply; its meaning is not derived from entries in dictionaries, and that is why with most of the words we use, we never had to look them up. If an alien doing ethnographic research tried to find out what white, racist, xenophobic, sexist, homophobic, fascist, ableist actually mean when humans use these words in context, he´d probably report that they are all different ways of saying "shut up! you have no right to say what you think!"; and the choice of one or another would be determined by how a person looks; in similar fashion to how we choose to say lunch, dinner or supper depending not on the content of the meal itself, but the orientation of the Earth in relation to its star.

We can do this experiment: ask an Artificial Intelligence program to guess what those words mean, without official definitions, only by how they are used in real contexts.

I think it is better to talk about what Trump does or doesn´t and explain why we think is wise or unwise to follow that path, and what we would do instead, and why is a better option.

What a person says reveals how a person thinks, and how a person thinks gives us an insight to how they behave or how they might behave. When I described Trump as a racist, my meaning wasn't to tell him to shut up. Funnily enough, my meaning was in line with the meaning you can find in a dictionary. But I suppose that that's just a coincidence.

Now given, for example, Trump's comments about Mexicans, and about African countries, I think that there's a basis for accusing him of racism. And given, for example, his sharing on social media of islamophobic propaganda videos by a far right British political party, I think that there's a basis for accusing him of islamophobia, and given...

You get the point, I think. Though I'm sure you'll be able to find a way to explain it all away. But I say there's no smoke without fire.

It is a risk to have such a person as president. I am wary of his judgement on important matters for these reasons and others.

https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/white-house-rejects-supremacist-label-no-one-has-done-more-than-trump-to-prove-white-people-are-not-superior?fbclid=IwAR0oSiDcy5OO8EYTWZkOjaCrbzWQ2uHK8RVK6ur58qsSeMGErp9V1XrOYVE

:grin:

You get the point, I think. Though I'm sure you'll be able to find a way to explain it all away. But I say there's no smoke without fire. — S

Can you use another term instead of "racism"? It does seem to imply that "Mexican" is a race, "Muslim" is a race, and "illegal immigrant" is a separate race too. Perhaps you mean Trump wants to filter out people who don´t have the level of civilization (democratic values, respect for secular Law, respect for human rights, and the abstract thinking skills required to understand those notions) that is required to live in a civilized society; and people who try to enter the U.S. illegally. Leave races for Indianapolis I recommend!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fVKpM6d3xow

would you be okay with restricting immigration from regions where cannibalism and human sacrifice is still practiced frequently? My point is if you agree that a nation should set and enforce standards to foreigners willing to apply for citizenship.

https://www.deviantart.com/saint-tepes/art/Cannibalism-World-Map-284854822

Can you use another term instead of "racism"? — DiegoT

No. This is an example of racism. It's a fitting word to use.