Well, you made the claim, it's not unreasonable to ask you to supply the link to the evidence. You spoke of 'proof' but it's a long way from that. But it's very interesting. Here's a useful discussion about it:I have a free standing offer to teach anyone how to use a dictionary and search engine — wuliheron
Chat rooms and one paper arguing against them are not proof against two experimental results showing empirical evidence of quantum mechanics in the brain. Either you have something that is a serious challenge to the evidence they have already presented or you're just blowing it out the rear. There is also evidence of quantum mechanics at work in more than one type of photosynthesis and bird navigation. Deny it all you want, but the growing body of evidence is that the theorists have been correct for over half a century that quantum mechanics are not confined to the subatomic and its not merely an issue of scale. — wuliheron
↪tom I have a free standing offer to teach anyone how to use a dictionary and search engine.
http://phys.org/news/2014-01-discovery-quantum-vibrations-microtubules-corroborates.html — wuliheron
The brain has turned out to possess a scalar analog architecture which displays no loyalty whatsoever to classical causal logic and every inclination to rely upon quantum mechanics instead for greater efficiency which can't be interpreted as classical. — wuliheron
... proteins which... rely upon ringing like a bell in order to expedite folding faster and, thus, displaying their particle-wave duality. — wuliheron
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.