Let me know where my logic is screwed. — Coeus
We know we are actually experiencing the past i.e. the now is a past experience. This has been shown by Benjamin Libet in his experiments.
So if we live or experience the past and this is known as the NOW then all nows are actually pasts. — Coeus
If we look to our pasts and see that all paths to each other are in a direct line i.e. a cause and effect then we know that to be a truth, that is to say we can verify one and only one direct resulting effect came about due to one particular cause. We can imagine that there were an infinite number of possible effects from that one cause but in the end there was one and only one cause per effect. — Coeus
So we say there has only been one path and not a multitude of possible paths that got us to here and now.
So if we accept this as true then it also has to be true in all futures. — Coeus
Now if we actually live or experience a now that is actually past, we know that light travels at the speed of light so all information we receive comes to us at the speed of light and enters our eyes but then goes through the rods and cones and then gets converted into electromechanical signals which are transmitted by sodium atoms and this is slower than light speed. — Coeus
So light comes in and is slowed down for processing in the brain.
Now we know there are billions if not trillions of neurons in the brain. So this information that is slowed down and transmitted throughout the brain is in effect slowed still more.
So the question remains, how can something slow down the speed of light? — Coeus
Einstein stated that as you approach the speed of light rulers contract, time slows but oddly mass increases?
So is the information coming into our eyes since it is under the control of light, contracted? — Coeus
In effect if we are truly experiencing the past as a now, then we are never in control of our future.
How can we being and existing in a past or rather experiencing it have any control on what is taking place out there up ahead? — Coeus
The question arises how the hell are you there in the future while you can only experience the past or what has happened? — Coeus
If you analyze it, like if I am going to the supermarket, I will not end up in New York or end up at some sammich shop or find myself in Florida etc. So many things are ruled out even to the extent of putting sugar or pepper or bleach in my tea. — Coeus
So we say there has only been one path and not a multitude of possible paths that got us to here and now. So if we accept this as true then it also has to be true in all futures. — Coeus
This tells me that there are not an infinite number of possibilities at each point or second in my future. — Coeus
When this speed of light information comes in it should be at a standstill and how the hell can a brain slow down information that is supposed to be topped or at a standstill? — Coeus
We know we are actually experiencing the past i.e. the now is a past experience. This has been shown by Benjamin Libet in his experiments. — Coeus
- MwwIf light informations stops at the eyes, how would we experience what we’re looking at?
Would we experience things at the speed of light due to no additional processing time through all those neurons? — Coeus
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.