If we have A that is and isn’t alongside B that is and isn’t then are either A or B true or false? — I like sushi
Take care to make the distinction between true/not true, and true/false. Two different animals.They cannot have truth value nor be regarded in an ontological or epistemic sense. — I like sushi
Lets just speak plainly about your issue. — DingoJones
A and B are absurdities. They cannot be true, false, not true or not false. — I like sushi
Maybe this: absurdity is a judgment about something, not what the thing is. 2+2=31 is false - and absurd. π = 3.2547 is also false, but maybe not absurd. I am conscious of not being crystal clear, here. But do you take the point anyway?I’m simply saying that A is not A necessarily leads to absurdity. If the propositions set out are inherently meaningless they don’t have any use. — I like sushi
My point was more about setting up propositions that refuse analysis — I like sushi
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.