'flat earth' nor 'no flat earth' — Banno
For instance, would you acknowledge that there are prescriptions of reason? Would you acknowledge that this argument form is valid:
1. P
2. Q
3. Therefore P and Q
And that the validity of this argument consists of no more or less than a prescription of reason to believe 3 if 1 and 2 are true? — Bartricks
Since atheists reject the very principle of unexplained belief, they also reject logic. Hence, atheists are not logical.
There is nothing more stupid than attacking a system merely because it ultimately rests on unexplained beliefs, given the fact that all systems are like that, including logic itself. — alcontali
It is evident that since neither 'God' nor 'no God' can be shown for thee sure satisfaction of all, the positions of both atheism and theism are indefensible — PoeticUniverse
Since atheists reject the very principle of unexplained belief, — alcontali
Indeed! I too, don't understand that rationale. I mean, there is plenty in the world that is unexplainable...including our own conscious existence. — 3017amen
My thoughts exactly. And I was already thinking about mathematics and abstract concepts. Nobody knows why they are so effective in cosmology and science, yet we just assume...………what? — 3017amen
You're trying to logic your way out of logic. It's not going to work. — Artemis
Atheism primarily uses philosophical rationalism to justify their belief. — 3017amen
P and-p describes how consciousness and subconsciousness works together no? — 3017amen
You're using rationalism to disprove EOG no?
And self reference unresolved paradox exist yes? — 3017amen
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.