• Deleted User
    0
    He's just cranky from another thread. We won't hijack more.
  • Terrapin Station
    13.8k
    Yes, your version of a sense of humor makes Aspies of us all.Coben

    You're going with "I was joking"?
  • Deleted User
    0
    It was the most charitable interpretation. I'll end my hijacking here.
  • Deleted User
    0
    Why not let's work with this part of my response?
    I think it can be useful to think of emotions in categories. I think it can also be useful not to box them in and notice nuances. Depends on the context. I suppose I take an instrumentalist view. What is the best way to think or speak about it in this or that context. And I would likely use different ways in different contexts. I do think that each experience is unique and if it is the specificity i want to focus on, then I might go into just such detail or at least let myself notice it. If I am angry at someone, I'd probably speak about it in less detail, just call it anger and say what it is about, since the nuances would often not be useful or would detract from the core message.Coben
12Next
bold
italic
underline
strike
code
quote
ulist
image
url
mention
reveal
youtube
tweet
Add a Comment

Welcome to The Philosophy Forum!

Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.