because he works on the proof that we do not construct reality for ourselves which is my aim

I literally :lol: That was one of the funniest posts I've seen in a long time.

your a cheap date mate

I’ve asked twice and no response.

Thanks but no thanks. Bye

what was your question, sorry

He asked about your familiarity with Husserl.

yes, i know he made great progress with phenomenology but didn't get all the way, he concluded that at some level we construct our own intention but then got hot and bothered because that doesn't make sense at the end of the day. i think this is the point about the conversion between duhem and pointcare

Guilty as charged

You don't think makes sense that we construct our own intentions? (Or are you thinking that it just doesn't make sense that we intentionally construct our own intentions?)

Wow - so much in one sentence and the claim is that this is true absolutely which I can see intuitively — NilsArnold

Oh god, this is going to be another one of those threads where the OP cannot understand the simple self-evident fact that what seems intuitively obvious to one person does not necessarily seem intuitively obvious to others.

Your intuition is just a set of thinking shortcuts your particular mix of genetic and environmental influences have made. It doesn't give you magic insight into reality.

"Modern thought has realised considerable progress by reducing the existent to the series of appearances which manifest it." — NilsArnold

This is saying that appearances in the mind are all that we ever 'see'.

Oh god, this is going to be another one of those threads [ ... ] Your intuition is just a set of thinking shortcuts your particular mix of genetic and environmental influences have made. It doesn't give you magic insight into reality. — Isaac

Doooood YES. Effin' amen! :clap: :sweat: